linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/2] workqueue: Provide destroy_delayed_work_on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140324125139.GC29892@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Mon, 24 Mar 2014 08:51:39 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] workqueue: Provide destroy_delayed_work_on_stack()

On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 02:20:44PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> If a delayed or deferrable work is on stack we need to tell debug
> objects that we are destroying the timer and the work. Otherwise we
> leak the tracking object.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>

How do you want to route this?  If it's better to route it with the
next patch, please feel free to do so.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/