[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <533032E5.2090004@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:58:05 +0530
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.linux@...il.com>,
Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@...com>,
<linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
<spear-devel@...t.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ata: add new-style AHCI platform driver for DaVinci
DA850 AHCI controller
On Thursday 20 March 2014 11:57 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Add the new ahci_da850 host driver and remove the deprecated
> ahci_platform_data platform code.
>
> Please note that the new driver doesn't have the superfluous
> clock control code as clock is already handled by the generic
> AHCI platform library code.
>
> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>
> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Looks much better now and re-tested it on DA850 EVM. Few issues
pointed out below.
> ---
> v2:
> - dropped the experimental tag from the config option help
> - fixed SYSCFG1 memory resource handling
> - hardcoded the multiplier data and added a note about it
> - used readl()/writel() instead of __raw_readl()/__raw_writel()
> - dropped the superflous clock control
> - cleaned up da850_sata_init()
> - changed the platform device name and removed the platform ids table
> - removed the deprecated ahci_platform_data platform code
> - updated the patch description
>
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c | 99 +++--------------------------
> drivers/ata/Kconfig | 9 +++
> drivers/ata/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/ata/ahci_da850.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)
I prefer not to mix platform and driver together in one patch. If you
separate out the platform changes, I can take then through my tree with
out risk of conflicts. The platform changes can come after the driver
is introduced so there is no breakage.
> create mode 100644 drivers/ata/ahci_da850.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c
> index 0486cdf2..72bb8d6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c
> @@ -1020,7 +1020,6 @@ int __init da8xx_register_spi_bus(int instance, unsigned num_chipselect)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DA850
> -
> static struct resource da850_sata_resources[] = {
> {
> .start = DA850_SATA_BASE,
> @@ -1028,103 +1027,22 @@ static struct resource da850_sata_resources[] = {
> .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
> },
> {
> + .start = DA8XX_SYSCFG1_BASE,
> + .end = DA8XX_SYSCFG1_BASE + SZ_4K - 1,
> + .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
This is not correct. The entire SYSCFG is not owned by SATA driver.
Its just that one PWRDN register. Here is a patch which applies on
top of your patch patch fixing it. Feel free to roll it in.
---8<---
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c
index 72bb8d6..56ea41d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c
@@ -1027,8 +1027,8 @@ static struct resource da850_sata_resources[] = {
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
{
- .start = DA8XX_SYSCFG1_BASE,
- .end = DA8XX_SYSCFG1_BASE + SZ_4K - 1,
+ .start = DA8XX_SYSCFG1_BASE + DA8XX_PWRDN_REG,
+ .end = DA8XX_SYSCFG1_BASE + DA8XX_PWRDN_REG + 0x3,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
{
diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_da850.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_da850.c
index 899270a..2c83613 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/ahci_da850.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_da850.c
@@ -16,8 +16,6 @@
#include <linux/ahci_platform.h>
#include "ahci.h"
-#define DA8XX_PWRDN_REG 0x18
-
/* SATA PHY Control Register offset from AHCI base */
#define SATA_P0PHYCR_REG 0x178
@@ -37,15 +35,15 @@
*/
#define DA850_SATA_CLK_MULTIPLIER 7
-static void da850_sata_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *syscfg1_base,
+static void da850_sata_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *pwrdn_reg,
void __iomem *ahci_base)
{
unsigned int val;
/* Enable SATA clock receiver */
- val = readl(syscfg1_base + DA8XX_PWRDN_REG);
+ val = readl(pwrdn_reg);
val &= ~BIT(0);
- writel(val, syscfg1_base + DA8XX_PWRDN_REG);
+ writel(val, pwrdn_reg);
val = SATA_PHY_MPY(DA850_SATA_CLK_MULTIPLIER + 1) | SATA_PHY_LOS(1) |
SATA_PHY_RXCDR(4) | SATA_PHY_RXEQ(1) | SATA_PHY_TXSWING(3) |
@@ -66,7 +64,7 @@ static int ahci_da850_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv;
struct resource *res;
- void __iomem *syscfg1_base;
+ void __iomem *pwrdn_reg;
int rc;
hpriv = ahci_platform_get_resources(pdev);
@@ -81,11 +79,11 @@ static int ahci_da850_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (!res)
goto disable_resources;
- syscfg1_base = devm_ioremap(dev, res->start, resource_size(res));
- if (!syscfg1_base)
+ pwrdn_reg = devm_ioremap(dev, res->start, resource_size(res));
+ if (!pwrdn_reg)
goto disable_resources;
- da850_sata_init(dev, syscfg1_base, hpriv->mmio);
+ da850_sata_init(dev, pwrdn_reg, hpriv->mmio);
rc = ahci_platform_init_host(pdev, hpriv, &ahci_da850_port_info, 0, 0);
if (rc)
---
Also, there is an additional change required in platform side
to make sure clock look-up succeeds. Here is the change needed,
please roll it into your platform changes patch.
---8<---
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
index 2ab0043..85399c9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ static struct clk_lookup da850_clks[] = {
CLK("spi_davinci.0", NULL, &spi0_clk),
CLK("spi_davinci.1", NULL, &spi1_clk),
CLK("vpif", NULL, &vpif_clk),
- CLK("ahci", NULL, &sata_clk),
+ CLK("ahci_da850", NULL, &sata_clk),
CLK("davinci-rproc.0", NULL, &dsp_clk),
CLK("ehrpwm", "fck", &ehrpwm_clk),
CLK("ehrpwm", "tbclk", &ehrpwm_tbclk),
---
Thanks,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists