lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:55:11 +0100
From:	Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
To:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, gleb@...nel.org,
	mtosatti@...hat.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
	jan.kiszka@...mens.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: ioapic: extract body of kvm_ioapic_set_irq

2014-03-23 09:44+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 21/03/2014 19:58, Radim Krčmář ha scritto:
> >>> +	/*
> >>> +	 * Return 0 for coalesced interrupts; for edge-triggered interrupts,
> >>> +	 * this only happens if a previous edge has not been delivered due
> >>> +	 * do masking.  For level interrupts, the remote_irr field tells
> >          (^ to)
> >>> +	 * us if the interrupt is waiting for an EOI.
> >
> >How do we know we haven't delivered an edge-triggered interrupt when
> >ioapic_service() always clears this IRR bit?
> 
> We know we have at least delivered it to the local APIC(s).  If it
> is masked in the ioredirtbl, ioapic_service doesn't clear the IRR.

I see, LAPIC can't "refuse" an interrupt, so kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic()
won't (mustn't) fail. (The code looks fragile if it returned -1.)

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists