[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140324175508.GA6143@potion.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:55:11 +0100
From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, gleb@...nel.org,
mtosatti@...hat.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
jan.kiszka@...mens.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: ioapic: extract body of kvm_ioapic_set_irq
2014-03-23 09:44+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 21/03/2014 19:58, Radim Krčmář ha scritto:
> >>> + /*
> >>> + * Return 0 for coalesced interrupts; for edge-triggered interrupts,
> >>> + * this only happens if a previous edge has not been delivered due
> >>> + * do masking. For level interrupts, the remote_irr field tells
> > (^ to)
> >>> + * us if the interrupt is waiting for an EOI.
> >
> >How do we know we haven't delivered an edge-triggered interrupt when
> >ioapic_service() always clears this IRR bit?
>
> We know we have at least delivered it to the local APIC(s). If it
> is masked in the ioredirtbl, ioapic_service doesn't clear the IRR.
I see, LAPIC can't "refuse" an interrupt, so kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic()
won't (mustn't) fail. (The code looks fragile if it returned -1.)
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists