lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5331728F.1090301@mev.co.uk>
Date:	Tue, 25 Mar 2014 12:11:59 +0000
From:	Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>
To:	Chase Southwood <chase.southwood@...oo.com>,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
CC:	hsweeten@...ionengravers.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: comedi: s626: use comedi_timeout() on remaining
 loops

On 2014-03-25 05:09, Chase Southwood wrote:
> There were just a handful of more while loops in this file that need timeouts,
> and this patch takes care of them, using comedi_timeout().  A couple of new
> callbacks are introduced, but there was one case where the appropriate callback
> function was already defined; in this case I have just used that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chase Southwood <chase.southwood@...oo.com>

I think it can be simplified a bit as described below.

> ---
>   drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s626.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s626.c b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s626.c
> index 95fadf3..4dc5659 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s626.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s626.c
> @@ -295,10 +295,24 @@ static void s626_debi_replace(struct comedi_device *dev, unsigned int addr,
>
>   /* **************  EEPROM ACCESS FUNCTIONS  ************** */
>
> +static int s626_i2c_handshake_eoc(struct comedi_device *dev,
> +				 struct comedi_subdevice *s,
> +				 struct comedi_insn *insn,
> +				 unsigned long context)
> +{
> +	unsigned int status;
> +
> +	status = s626_mc_test(dev, S626_MC2_UPLD_IIC, S626_P_MC2);
> +	if (status)
> +		return 0;
> +	return -EBUSY;
> +}
> +

So s626_i2c_handshake_eoc() tests the S626_MC2_UPLD_IIC bit of the 
S626_P_MC2 register and returns 0 if the bit is high or -EBUSY if it is low.

>   static uint32_t s626_i2c_handshake(struct comedi_device *dev, uint32_t val)
>   {
>   	struct s626_private *devpriv = dev->private;
>   	unsigned int ctrl;
> +	uint32_t ret;
>
>   	/* Write I2C command to I2C Transfer Control shadow register */
>   	writel(val, devpriv->mmio + S626_P_I2CCTRL);
> @@ -308,8 +322,9 @@ static uint32_t s626_i2c_handshake(struct comedi_device *dev, uint32_t val)
>   	 * wait for upload confirmation.
>   	 */
>   	s626_mc_enable(dev, S626_MC2_UPLD_IIC, S626_P_MC2);
> -	while (!s626_mc_test(dev, S626_MC2_UPLD_IIC, S626_P_MC2))
> -		;
> +	ret = comedi_timeout(dev, NULL, NULL, s626_i2c_handshake_eoc, 0);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

That's fine.  Both the original while loop and the comedi_timeout() call 
are waiting for the S626_MC_UPLD_IIC bit to go high.

>
>   	/* Wait until I2C bus transfer is finished or an error occurs */
>   	do {
> @@ -2029,8 +2044,9 @@ static int s626_ai_insn_read(struct comedi_device *dev,
>   	/* Wait for the data to arrive in FB BUFFER 1 register. */
>
>   	/* Wait for ADC done */
> -	while (!(readl(devpriv->mmio + S626_P_PSR) & S626_PSR_GPIO2))
> -		;
> +	ret = comedi_timeout(dev, s, insn, s626_ai_eoc, 0);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
>
>   	/* Fetch ADC data from audio interface's input shift register. */
>
> @@ -2641,6 +2657,36 @@ static int s626_allocate_dma_buffers(struct comedi_device *dev)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>
> +enum {
> +	s626_initialize_wait_i2c_abort,
> +	s626_initialize_wait_i2c_err_reset
> +};
> +
> +static int s626_initialize_eoc(struct comedi_device *dev,
> +			      struct comedi_subdevice *s,
> +			      struct comedi_insn *insn,
> +			      unsigned long context)
> +{
> +	struct s626_private *devpriv = dev->private;
> +	unsigned int status;
> +
> +	switch (context) {
> +	case s626_initialize_wait_i2c_abort:
> +		status = readl(devpriv->mmio + S626_P_MC2);
> +		if (status & S626_MC2_UPLD_IIC)
> +			return 0;
> +		break;

The 's626_initialize_wait_i2c_abort' case returns 0 if the 
S626_MC2_UPLD_IIC bit is high and the function around it will return 
-EBUSY otherwise.  That's basically the same as the 
s626_i2c_handshake_eoc() callback except it doesn't call s626_mc_test() 
to read the register and check the bit, it does it itself.

> +	case s626_initialize_wait_i2c_err_reset:
> +		status = s626_mc_test(dev, S626_MC2_UPLD_IIC, S626_P_MC2);
> +		if (status)
> +			return 0;
> +		break;

The 's626_initialize_wait_i2c_err_reset' case is also basically the same 
as the s626_i2c_handshake_eoc() callback.

> +	default:
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +	return -EBUSY;
> +}
> +

It seems both supported context case values of the s626_initialize_eoc() 
callback basically do the same thing as the s626_i2c_handshake_eoc() 
callback, so you could use that callback instead of this one.

>   static int s626_initialize(struct comedi_device *dev)
>   {
>   	struct s626_private *devpriv = dev->private;
> @@ -2681,8 +2727,10 @@ static int s626_initialize(struct comedi_device *dev)
>   	writel(S626_I2C_CLKSEL | S626_I2C_ABORT,
>   	       devpriv->mmio + S626_P_I2CSTAT);
>   	s626_mc_enable(dev, S626_MC2_UPLD_IIC, S626_P_MC2);
> -	while (!(readl(devpriv->mmio + S626_P_MC2) & S626_MC2_UPLD_IIC))
> -		;
> +	ret = comedi_timeout(dev, NULL, NULL, s626_initialize_eoc,
> +			     s626_initialize_wait_i2c_abort);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

That's fine.  The original while loop is waiting for the 
S626_MC2_UPLD_IIC bit to go high and so is the comedi_timeout() call. 
But you could re-use the s626_i2c_handshake_eoc() callback instead of 
the s626_initialize_wait_i2c_abort() as described above.

>
>   	/*
>   	 * Per SAA7146 data sheet, write to STATUS
> @@ -2691,8 +2739,10 @@ static int s626_initialize(struct comedi_device *dev)
>   	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
>   		writel(S626_I2C_CLKSEL, devpriv->mmio + S626_P_I2CSTAT);
>   		s626_mc_enable(dev, S626_MC2_UPLD_IIC, S626_P_MC2);
> -		while (!s626_mc_test(dev, S626_MC2_UPLD_IIC, S626_P_MC2))
> -			;
> +		ret = comedi_timeout(dev, NULL, NULL, s626_initialize_eoc,
> +				     s626_initialize_wait_i2c_err_reset);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;

As above, the original while loop is waiting for the S626_MC2_UPLD_IIC 
bit to go high, so you could re-use the s626_i2c_handshake_eoc() callback.

>   	}
>
>   	/*
>

Best regards,
Ian.

-- 
-=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd.    E-mail: <abbotti@....co.uk>        )=-
-=( Tel: +44 (0)161 477 1898   FAX: +44 (0)161 718 3587         )=-
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ