[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1395751634-4273-1-git-send-email-shuah.kh@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 06:47:13 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, john@...ev.com, ced@...ck.net
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
shuahkhan@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] staging/usbip: fix store_attach() sscanf return value check
sscanf() parses the input buffer for four input items. However,
the return value check is incorrect, as it checks for one input
item instead of four which is what it is expecting in the input
buffer. As a result, sscanf() will always fail even when the input
buffer is correct.
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
---
v2: Fixed changelog
drivers/staging/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c b/drivers/staging/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c
index e098032..1ff24e9 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static ssize_t store_attach(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
* @devid: unique device identifier in a remote host
* @speed: usb device speed in a remote host
*/
- if (sscanf(buf, "%u %u %u %u", &rhport, &sockfd, &devid, &speed) != 1)
+ if (sscanf(buf, "%u %u %u %u", &rhport, &sockfd, &devid, &speed) != 4)
return -EINVAL;
usbip_dbg_vhci_sysfs("rhport(%u) sockfd(%u) devid(%u) speed(%u)\n",
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists