linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the keystone tree with the arm-soc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <533181ED.6040702@ti.com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Mar 2014 09:17:33 -0400
From:	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
To:	"Balbi, Felipe" <balbi@...com>
CC:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the keystone tree with the arm-soc
 tree

On Monday 24 March 2014 09:23 PM, Balbi, Felipe wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 08:00:03PM -0400, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> On Monday 24 March 2014 07:55 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi Santosh,
>>>
>>> Today's linux-next merge of the keystone tree got a conflict in
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile between commit ba5a37e52194 ("ARM: mvebu: Move
>>> kirkwood DT boards into mach-mvebu") from the arm-soc tree and commit
>>> 400550ae7e77 ("ARM: dts: Build all keystone dt blobs") from the keystone
>>> tree.
>>>
>>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
>>> is required).
>>>
>> Looks fine. Thanks
> 
> wow, not even a mention of my original patch [1]. I also couldn't find
> your patch [2] anywhere in the mailing list archives, not even google
> could find it. The only place that commit was ever mentioned was this
> very thread.
> 
I thought, we closed the thread mentioning about the patch applied
on the same thread. [1]

> The patch I wrote was valid for v3.14-rc7 (the base where it was
> written), I'd expect to, at a minimum, have a mention or a Reported-by
> or at least see your patch in the mailing list.
> 
> Anyway, it's just a patch. Nevermind.
> 
I missed to add the reported-by tag and also should have just pasted
the patch in the reply. Sorry about that.

regards,
Santosh

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg27351.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/