[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5331B10F.3050402@biereigel.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 17:38:39 +0100
From: Stefan Biereigel <stefan@...reigel.de>
To: Kieran Clancy <clancy.kieran@...il.com>,
Lan Tianyu <lantianyu1986@...il.com>
CC: Stefan Biereigel <security@...reigel-wb.de>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r kernel org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
San Zamoyski <san@...snet.pl>,
Juan Manuel Cabo <juanmanuel.cabo@...il.com>,
"D. Jansen" <dennis.jansen@....de>,
Maurizio D'Addona <mauritiusdadd@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION 3.14-rc6] Samsung N150 lid does not "open" after
suspend to RAM.
Hello Kieran,
thanks for the input. I use /proc/acpi/button/lid/LID0/state as an
indicator - whenever I resume from sleep on a bad kernel, state is
"closed" afterwards, until i close and re-open the lid.
I will build a kernel with dynamic debug enabled and grab the output if
it is of any help. Until then - my DSDT is uploaded here:
http://filebin.ca/1GkDaYm5U1lp/dsdt-samsung-n150
Stefan
Am 25.03.2014 14:23, schrieb Kieran Clancy:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Lan Tianyu <lantianyu1986@...il.com> wrote:
>> 2014-03-24 19:19 GMT+08:00 Stefan Biereigel <security@...reigel-wb.de>:
>>> Hi,
>>> thank you for the suggestion. The patch resolves the issue on my N150
>>> when applied to a clean 3.14-rc7. Anyways I'm wondering if similar
>>> problems to mine now exist on the Samsung Series 7/9 notebooks?
>>>
>>> Is any further action from my part required?
>>
>> Do you have these machines? If yes, please provide the output of
>> dmidecode command.
>>
>> Cc guys of commit ad332c8a.
>
> Hi guys,
>
> That's a surprising side-effect, although I guess I shouldn't be
> surprised by Samsung ACPI weirdness anymore.
>
> If we can, I'd like to get to the bottom of this rather than just turn
> off this fix (which we know works for series 5, 7 and 9 without
> problems).
>
>>>> 2014-03-24 15:50 GMT+08:00 Stefan Biereigel <security@...reigel-wb.de>:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> starting with 3.14-rc6, the lid on my Samsung N150 behaves weird: My
>>>>> system is set up, so that it should suspend to RAM as soon as the lid is
>>>>> closed. Beginning with 3.14-rc6, the lid goes from "open" to "closed"
>>>>> correctly the first time (and the system suspends), but after resuming
>>>>> from standby (by opening the lid), the lid does not change to "open" again.
>>>>> Of course, closing the lid again does not induce suspend to RAM then.
>>>>> Opening the lid now (while not sleeping), makes ACPI notify the opening,
>>>>> so I guess ACPI "misses" or discards the lid open event from the EC when
>>>>> coming from sleep.
>>>>> Now, closing the lid again does induce suspend to RAM. This behaviour is
>>>>> reproducible: every other time, suspending works.
>>>>>
>>>>> This behaviour seems to be introduced by commit ad332c8a: ACPI / EC:
>>>>> Clear stale EC events on Samsung systems.
>>>>> Which was introduced after 3.14-rc5.
>>>>>
>>>>> When opening the lid to resume from standby, i see in dmesg:
>>>>> Mar 23 22:12:04 little1 kernel: [ 7630.932074] ACPI : EC: 1 stale EC
>>>>> events cleared
>>>>> (which comes from drivers/acpi/ec.c)
>>>>>
>>>>> Seems to me, that the "open" event is cleared from the EC, but also
>>>>> discarded instead of passed on. Shouldn't the correct behaviour be to
>>>>> report all the pending events, read from the EC, as ACPI events? Can you
>>>>> point me in a direction for fixing the issue cleanly, then I will try to
>>>>> find a solution and prepare a patch for this issue.
>
> Stefan, thank you for reporting this issue.
>
> Our rationale for discarding the events was that events queued during
> sleep are probably no longer relevant. There could also be other
> unwanted side-effects of blindly executing all of the old
> instructions. But in your case, this assumption might be wrong.
>
> What command are you using to check if the lid is "open" or "closed"?
> Is it because the screen is not waking up, or some other effect, or
> just because it won't suspend again when it's re-closed?
>
> Do other events like AC plug/unplug affect any of this if you do them
> during this bad state?
>
> I'd like to see exactly which EC command byte is being thrown away
> here. If you do something like this (with dynamic debug enabled)
>
> echo -n 'file ec.c +p' | sudo tee /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug/control
>
> You should get massively verbose EC stuff filling your dmesg, but I am
> just interested in the EC read/write bytes just before and around the
> "1 stale EC events cleared" message. Grab this out of dmesg before it
> fills with other stuff.
>
> This will tell us what command we are being asked to run. If you can,
> please do it a few times to see if it's the same command each time or
> something different.
>
> You can turn the debug output off again with:
>
> echo -n 'file ec.c -p' | sudo tee /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug/control
>
> I might also need a copy of your DSDT, if you can send me that
> separately in another email (not to the list):
>
> cat /sys/firmware/acpi/tables/DSDT > .DSDT.aml
>
> Thank you,
> Kieran.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists