[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5331CD43.1010601@ahsoftware.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 19:38:59 +0100
From: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
To: Sebastian Capella <sebastian.capella@...aro.org>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jonathan Austin <jonathan.austin@....com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Victor Kamensky <victor.kamensky@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sricharan R <r.sricharan@...com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@...com>, Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] ARM hibernation / suspend-to-disk
Am 19.03.2014 22:06, schrieb Sebastian Capella:
> On 19 March 2014 13:47, Sebastian Capella <sebastian.capella@...aro.org> wrote:
>> diff --git a/kernel/power/hibernate.c b/kernel/power/hibernate.c
>> index a5f702a..d96b910 100644
>> --- a/kernel/power/hibernate.c
>> +++ b/kernel/power/hibernate.c
>> @@ -594,7 +594,8 @@ static void power_down(void)
>> case HIBERNATION_PLATFORM:
>> hibernation_platform_enter();
>> case HIBERNATION_SHUTDOWN:
>> - kernel_power_off();
>> + if (pm_power_off)
>> + kernel_power_off();
>> break;
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
>> case HIBERNATION_SUSPEND:
>>
>>
>> This follows the behavior in the reboot syscall which does it this way
>> also. I'm testing this now, and it seems work fine. If this looks
>> good, I can add it as an additional patch.
>
> BTW, one thing I would point out is that kernel_power_off and
> kernel_halt call the same notifier but with different parameters
> (SYS_POWER_OFF and SYS_HALT).
>
> If pm_power_down is null, I dont see why we'd want to notify
> SYS_POWER_OFF before SYS_HALT. With the previous change I'm assuming
> there's no benefit, so please chime in if you know a reason.
Both states, power off and sys halt, do sound pretty final and I would
assume something is broken, if power off is called before sys halt or
vice versa. At least I would never expect that the
reboot/poweroff/syshalt notifier may be called twice (and thats why the
heartbeat-trigger may crash).
But just in case, changing that behaviour in ledtrig-heartbeat.c would
be pretty easy, just remove the heartbeat_reboot_notifier (which plays
nice and deregisters the trigger on reboot) and use the panic_notifier
(which doesn't unregister the trigger but just turns off the led) for
reboot too. Another solution would be to unregister the reboot_notifier
in the reboot_nofifier itself. I've just seen one watchdog driver
(drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c) which does that. But I still think such
shouldn't be necessary (and I haven't had a look at other
reboot_notifier users).
Regards,
Alexander Holler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists