[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140325185727.GU4173@kvack.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 14:57:27 -0400
From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, jmoyer@...hat.com,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
miaox@...fujitsu.com, linux-aio@...ck.org,
fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aio: ensure access to ctx->ring_pages is correctly serialised
Hi Sasha,
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 01:47:40PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 03/24/2014 03:07 PM, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
...
> >Yeah, that's a problem -- thanks for the report. The ring_lock mutex can't
> >be nested inside of mmap_sem, as aio_read_events_ring() can take a page
> >fault while holding ring_mutex. That makes the following change required.
> >I'll fold this change into the patch that caused this issue.
>
> Yup, that does the trick.
>
> Could you please add something to document why this is a trylock instead of
> a lock? If
> I were reading the code there's no way I'd understand what's the reason
> behind it
> without knowing of this bug report.
Done. I've updated the patch in my aio-next.git tree, so it should be in
tomorrow's linux-next, and will give it one last day for any further problem
reports. Thanks for testing!
-ben
> Thanks,
> Sasha
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists