[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAErSpo5uyJxvYk42pf0mxRNO6ZSFmQW4AHfe1qGBMDoUiD0BHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 13:56:45 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@....com>,
Sunil Kovvuri <sunil.kovvuri@...il.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
patches <patches@....com>, "jcm@...hat.com" <jcm@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] pci: APM X-Gene PCIe controller driver
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com> wrote:
> ... I'm a bit baffled by pci_claim_resource()
> as it doesn't seem to be used by some architectures. Does it mean it
> is not needed unless you have some BIOS setting up resources for you
> and in that case you need to go and claim the resource?
Many architectures don't use pci_claim_resource() yet. I'm trying to
unify this so all architectures do use it, but it's taking me a long
time to get this done.
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists