[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYxeieES5Y5tbCRfSe=Cnj2QsoU5KvSPZ99XsJ9AUrEmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 21:43:49 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: delicious quinoa <delicious.quinoa@...il.com>,
Alan Tull <atull@...era.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...era.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpio: dwapb: do not create the irq mapping upfront.
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
> Linus, I don't understand why you need the mapping upfront.
This is because irqchips and gpiochips need to be orthogonal
APIs.
> I looked at
> those two links and you quote gpio_to_irq() which is not required.
In a *lot* of drivers it is implicitly required that gpio_to_irq()
is called first because they only call irq_create_mapping()
there. (And not in subsequent interrupt handlers etc.)
No matter what, I would worry less about that and spend
some time on using my new gpiolib helpers for
gpiochip_irqchip_add() and
gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip().
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists