[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140325072530.GP19349@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 09:25:30 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bisected] NULL pointer dereference in acpi_gpiochip_add (on
modprobe ssb)
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 07:31:11PM +0100, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> > Actually gpiolib seems to handle ->dev as optional. Can you try this patch
> > instead? Thanks.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> > index bf0f8b476696..642b2bf3360e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> > @@ -501,6 +501,9 @@ void acpi_gpiochip_add(struct gpio_chip *chip)
> > acpi_handle handle;
> > acpi_status status;
> >
> > + if (!chip || !chip->dev)
> > + return;
> > +
> > handle = ACPI_HANDLE(chip->dev);
> > if (!handle)
> > return;
> > @@ -531,6 +534,9 @@ void acpi_gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip)
> > acpi_handle handle;
> > acpi_status status;
> >
> > + if (!chip || !chip->dev)
> > + return;
> > +
> > handle = ACPI_HANDLE(chip->dev);
> > if (!handle)
> > return;
>
> Thanks, this patch solves the problem.
Great thanks for testing. Can I add your tested-by to the patch?
I'll submit a formal patch for this next week as I'm currently on vacation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists