linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] NFSD, lost nfserrno() call in nfsd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6158.1395735542@jrobl>
Date:	Tue, 25 Mar 2014 17:19:02 +0900
From:	"J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05g@...il.com>
To:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFSD, lost nfserrno() call in nfsd_setattr()


"J. Bruce Fields":
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:27:53AM +0900, J. R. Okajima wrote:
> > 
> > There is a regression in
> > 	208d0ac 2014-01-07 nfsd4: break only delegations when appropriate
> > which deletes an nfserrno() call in nfsd_setattr() (by accident,
> > probably), and NFSD becomes ignoring an error from VFS.
> > 
> > Here is a patch to fix it.
>
> Thanks for cathing that!  Queueing up for 3.14.

Now rc8 is released, but this patch is still un-merged.
The bug is actually a show-stopper for my local tests.
Do you really have a plan to do it? Or should I ask Linus Torvalds
directly?


J. R. Okajima
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/