[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53314017.8040104@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 16:36:39 +0800
From: "zheng.li" <zheng.x.li@...cle.com>
To: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, fubar@...ibm.com, andy@...yhouse.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
joe.jin@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: Inactive slaves should keep inactive flag's
value to 1 in tlb and alb mode.
于 2014年03月25日 11:42, Ding Tianhong 写道:
> On 2014/3/25 11:00, Zheng Li wrote:
>> In bond mode tlb and alb, inactive slaves should keep inactive flag to
>> 1 to refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active slave send broadcast packets
>> (for example ARP requests) which will arrive inactive slaves on same host from switch,
>> but inactive slave's inactive flag is zero that cause bridge receive the broadcast
>> packets to produce a wrong entry in forward table. Typical situation is domu send some
>> ARP request which go out from dom0 bond's active slave, then the ARP broadcast request
>> packets go back to inactive slave from switch, because the inactive slave's inactive
>> flag is zero, kernel will receive the packets and pass them to bridge, that cause dom0's
>> bridge map domu's MAC address to port of bond, bridge should map domu's MAC to port of vif.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zheng Li <zheng.x.li@...cle.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> index e5628fc..8761df6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> @@ -3062,7 +3062,7 @@ static int bond_open(struct net_device *bond_dev)
>> && (slave != bond->curr_active_slave)) {
>> bond_set_slave_inactive_flags(slave,
>> BOND_SLAVE_NOTIFY_NOW);
>> - } else {
>> + } else if (!bond_is_lb(bond)) {
>> bond_set_slave_active_flags(slave,
>> BOND_SLAVE_NOTIFY_NOW);
>> }
>>
> I think you did not fix the problem completely, the state monitor will change the status for the slaves
> and the inactive slave still could receive the broadcast.
Had tested, it can fix the issue, verified by our QA.
Default set slave of bond as inactive when add a slave to bond, when
link UP, just set one slave as current active slave and clear its
inactive flag, the inactive slave's inactive flag will keep the value of 1.
>
> Regards
> Ding
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists