linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] clk: sunxi: Remove calls to clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 25 Mar 2014 08:50:59 +0100
From:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
Cc:	Emilio Lopez <emilio@...pez.com.ar>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, kevin.z.m.zh@...il.com,
	sunny@...winnertech.com, shuge@...winnertech.com,
	zhuzhenhua@...winnertech.com, andriy.shevchenko@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] clk: sunxi: Remove calls to clk_put

Hi Mike,

On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 02:51:20PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Maxime Ripard (2014-03-13 08:14:13)
> > Callers of clk_put must disable the clock first. This also means that as long
> > as the clock is enabled the driver should hold a reference to that clock.
> > Hence, the call to clk_put here are bogus and should be removed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
> 
> Looks good to me. There is a balanced clk_put in the module remove
> function?

Actually, this is not part of any module, it's part of the function
called through CLK_OF_DECLARE, so there's never a remove function for
this code.

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)