linux-kernel - [PATCH 07/14] hrtimer: use base->hres_active directly instead of hrtimer_hres

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <66f4cd9641551d97251e89d792053fbacd4a812f.1395832156.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date:	Wed, 26 Mar 2014 16:51:13 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	tglx@...utronix.de
Cc:	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	fweisbec@...il.com, linaro-networking@...aro.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 07/14] hrtimer: use base->hres_active directly instead of hrtimer_hres_active()

retrigger_next_event() is defined within #ifdef CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS and we
already have pointer to base available. So it makes more sense to simply use
base->hres_active instead of doing this by calling hrtimer_hres_active():

	__this_cpu_read(hrtimer_bases.hres_active)

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
 kernel/hrtimer.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/hrtimer.c b/kernel/hrtimer.c
index 32d1504..cb485b9 100644
--- a/kernel/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/hrtimer.c
@@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ static void retrigger_next_event(void *arg)
 {
 	struct hrtimer_cpu_base *base = &__get_cpu_var(hrtimer_bases);
 
-	if (!hrtimer_hres_active())
+	if (!base->hres_active)
 		return;
 
 	raw_spin_lock(&base->lock);
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/