[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <7eb4d1a03031b4d873ce08e8912900d7936a3ca8.1395832156.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 16:51:18 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fweisbec@...il.com, linaro-networking@...aro.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 12/14] hrtimer: don't emulate notifier call to initialize timer base
In hrtimers_init() we need to call init_hrtimers_cpu() for boot CPU. For this,
currently we are emulating a call to hotplug notifier. Probably this was done
initially to get rid of code redundancy. But this sequence always called a
single routine, i.e. init_hrtimers_cpu(), and so calling that routine directly
would be better. This would get rid of emulating a notifier call, few typecasts
and the extra steps we are doing in notifier callback.
So, this patch calls init_hrtimers_cpu() directly from hrtimers_init().
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
kernel/hrtimer.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/hrtimer.c b/kernel/hrtimer.c
index f14d861..39dbdbd 100644
--- a/kernel/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/hrtimer.c
@@ -1756,8 +1756,7 @@ static struct notifier_block hrtimers_nb = {
void __init hrtimers_init(void)
{
- hrtimer_cpu_notify(&hrtimers_nb, (unsigned long)CPU_UP_PREPARE,
- (void *)(long)smp_processor_id());
+ init_hrtimers_cpu(smp_processor_id());
register_cpu_notifier(&hrtimers_nb);
#ifdef CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS
open_softirq(HRTIMER_SOFTIRQ, run_hrtimer_softirq);
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists