linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] CPU idle for Armada XP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140326004223.GL28304@titan.lakedaemon.net>
Date:	Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:42:23 -0400
From:	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
To:	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>,
	Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@...vell.com>,
	Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] CPU idle for Armada XP

Gregory,

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:48:11PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
...
> The first patch should go through ARM subsystem and should be taken by
> Russell King. I made few change on it following Lorenzo advice and
> now it will reuse the cpu v7 suspend and resume function and just do
> specific operation before calling them.
> 
> The 13th patch 'cpuidle: mvebu: Add initial cpu idle support for
> Armada 370/XP SoC' is the only one who should go to the cpuidle
> subsystem. But of course I would like that Daniel Lezcano or Rafael
> J. Wysocki have a look on the whole series and especially patches 10,
> 12 and 14.

Ok, I'm tired.  :)  Help me out here.  Patches 1 and 13 are depended on
by the other patches and vice-versa, right?  In that case, I'm thinking
it's best to seek Acks from the other maintainers and keep the whole
branch together.  Please tell me if I'm wrong.

thx,

Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/