lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpomzsV+HhH9r3s0jJH_NT0bzdDEd+3k8bopPg9vtVHc5Lw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Mar 2014 19:47:15 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Linaro Networking <linaro-networking@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [LNG] Re: [PATCH 12/14] hrtimer: don't emulate notifier call to
 initialize timer base

On 26 March 2014 18:10, Srivatsa S. Bhat
<srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> I don't think this is such a good idea. Open-coding a part of that callback
> in the init routine can lead to loop-holes down the road:

We think that we are open-coding part of that callback here because it is
implemented that way on the first design.

Rather, we should have a common routine which should do all the work
required when a CPU comes up. And any modification should be done
to that code.

> what if someone
> changes or adds something to the CPU_UP_PREPARE switch-case, and forgets to
> do the same in the init-routine?

This is not a driver which only 2-3 people use. This part is so well reviewed
by so many highly smart people that this should never happen. And if it
happens than its nothing but a review mistake.

> It is more comforting to know that there is just one single place where CPU
> hotplug operations are handled (hrtimer_cpu_notify). That, in turn is good
> for reliability because it makes it easier to write bug-free code.

And for me that single place is: init_hrtimers_cpu() :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ