linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] staging: silicom: remove BP_PROC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1395843846-3550-1-git-send-email-sj38.park@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Mar 2014 23:24:06 +0900
From:	SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
To:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, chad@...c.us, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Cc:	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] staging: silicom: remove BP_PROC_SUPPORT dependant code

Some code is hide inside #ifdef BP_PROC_SUPPORT and it never defined
anywhere. And, it made defined but not used function which calling
code was hide inside #ifdef BP_PROC_SUPPORT and caused following
build warning:

drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c:6786:12: warning:
‘bp_proc_create’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
 static int bp_proc_create(void)
            ^

Fix the warning and remove code complexity by remove whole code
inside #ifdef BP_PROC_SUPPORT.

Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
---
 drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c | 39 -------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c b/drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c
index 6b9365b..530d621 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c
@@ -119,7 +119,6 @@ static void if_scan_init(void);
 
 static int bypass_proc_create_dev_sd(struct bpctl_dev *pbp_device_block);
 static int bypass_proc_remove_dev_sd(struct bpctl_dev *pbp_device_block);
-static int bp_proc_create(void);
 
 static int is_bypass_fn(struct bpctl_dev *pbpctl_dev);
 static int get_dev_idx_bsf(int bus, int slot, int func);
@@ -6399,25 +6398,6 @@ static int __init bypass_init_module(void)
 	}
 
 	register_netdevice_notifier(&bp_notifier_block);
-#ifdef BP_PROC_SUPPORT
-	{
-		int i = 0;
-		/* unsigned long flags; */
-		/* rcu_read_lock(); */
-		bp_proc_create();
-		for (i = 0; i < device_num; i++) {
-			if (bpctl_dev_arr[i].ifindex) {
-				/* spin_lock_irqsave(&bpvm_lock, flags); */
-				bypass_proc_remove_dev_sd(&bpctl_dev_arr[i]);
-				bypass_proc_create_dev_sd(&bpctl_dev_arr[i]);
-				/* spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bpvm_lock, flags); */
-			}
-
-		}
-		/* rcu_read_unlock(); */
-	}
-#endif
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -6431,13 +6411,6 @@ static void __exit bypass_cleanup_module(void)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < device_num; i++) {
 		/* unsigned long flags; */
-#ifdef BP_PROC_SUPPORT
-/*	spin_lock_irqsave(&bpvm_lock, flags);
-	rcu_read_lock(); */
-		bypass_proc_remove_dev_sd(&bpctl_dev_arr[i]);
-/*	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bpvm_lock, flags);
-	rcu_read_unlock(); */
-#endif
 		remove_bypass_wd_auto(&bpctl_dev_arr[i]);
 		bpctl_dev_arr[i].reset_time = 0;
 
@@ -6783,18 +6756,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bp_if_scan_sd);
 
 static struct proc_dir_entry *bp_procfs_dir;
 
-static int bp_proc_create(void)
-{
-	bp_procfs_dir = proc_mkdir(BP_PROC_DIR, init_net.proc_net);
-	if (bp_procfs_dir == (struct proc_dir_entry *)0) {
-		printk(KERN_DEBUG
-		       "Could not create procfs nicinfo directory %s\n",
-		       BP_PROC_DIR);
-		return -1;
-	}
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static int procfs_add(char *proc_name, const struct file_operations *fops,
 		      struct bpctl_dev *dev)
 {
-- 
1.8.3.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/