| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1d0196602182e5284f3289eaea0219e62a51d1c4.1395846845.git.vdavydov@parallels.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 19:28:05 +0400
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
To: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: <hannes@...xchg.org>, <mhocko@...e.cz>, <glommer@...il.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<devel@...nvz.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH -mm 2/4] sl[au]b: charge slabs to memcg explicitly
We have only a few places where we actually want to charge kmem so
instead of intruding into the general page allocation path with
__GFP_KMEMCG it's better to explictly charge kmem there. All kmem
charges will be easier to follow that way.
This is a step towards removing __GFP_KMEMCG. It removes __GFP_KMEMCG
from memcg caches' allocflags. Instead it makes slab allocation path
call memcg_charge_kmem directly getting memcg to charge from the cache's
memcg params.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
mm/memcontrol.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
mm/slab.c | 7 ++++++-
mm/slab_common.c | 6 +-----
mm/slub.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
5 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index e9dfcdad24c5..b8aaecc25cbf 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -512,6 +512,9 @@ void memcg_update_array_size(int num_groups);
struct kmem_cache *
__memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t gfp);
+int memcg_charge_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfp, int order);
+void memcg_uncharge_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, int order);
+
void mem_cgroup_destroy_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep);
int __kmem_cache_destroy_memcg_children(struct kmem_cache *s);
@@ -589,17 +592,7 @@ memcg_kmem_commit_charge(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int order)
* @cachep: the original global kmem cache
* @gfp: allocation flags.
*
- * This function assumes that the task allocating, which determines the memcg
- * in the page allocator, belongs to the same cgroup throughout the whole
- * process. Misacounting can happen if the task calls memcg_kmem_get_cache()
- * while belonging to a cgroup, and later on changes. This is considered
- * acceptable, and should only happen upon task migration.
- *
- * Before the cache is created by the memcg core, there is also a possible
- * imbalance: the task belongs to a memcg, but the cache being allocated from
- * is the global cache, since the child cache is not yet guaranteed to be
- * ready. This case is also fine, since in this case the GFP_KMEMCG will not be
- * passed and the page allocator will not attempt any cgroup accounting.
+ * All memory allocated from a per-memcg cache is charged to the owner memcg.
*/
static __always_inline struct kmem_cache *
memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t gfp)
@@ -667,6 +660,15 @@ memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t gfp)
{
return cachep;
}
+
+static inline int memcg_charge_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfp, int order)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline void memcg_uncharge_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, int order)
+{
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM */
#endif /* _LINUX_MEMCONTROL_H */
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 81a162d01d4d..9bbc088e3107 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3506,6 +3506,21 @@ out:
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__memcg_kmem_get_cache);
+int memcg_charge_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfp, int order)
+{
+ if (is_root_cache(s))
+ return 0;
+ return memcg_charge_kmem(s->memcg_params->memcg, gfp,
+ PAGE_SIZE << order);
+}
+
+void memcg_uncharge_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, int order)
+{
+ if (is_root_cache(s))
+ return;
+ memcg_uncharge_kmem(s->memcg_params->memcg, PAGE_SIZE << order);
+}
+
/*
* We need to verify if the allocation against current->mm->owner's memcg is
* possible for the given order. But the page is not allocated yet, so we'll
diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
index eebc619ae33c..af126a37dafd 100644
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -1664,8 +1664,12 @@ static struct page *kmem_getpages(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t flags,
if (cachep->flags & SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT)
flags |= __GFP_RECLAIMABLE;
+ if (memcg_charge_slab(cachep, flags, cachep->gfporder))
+ return NULL;
+
page = alloc_pages_exact_node(nodeid, flags | __GFP_NOTRACK, cachep->gfporder);
if (!page) {
+ memcg_uncharge_slab(cachep, cachep->gfporder);
if (!(flags & __GFP_NOWARN) && printk_ratelimit())
slab_out_of_memory(cachep, flags, nodeid);
return NULL;
@@ -1724,7 +1728,8 @@ static void kmem_freepages(struct kmem_cache *cachep, struct page *page)
memcg_release_pages(cachep, cachep->gfporder);
if (current->reclaim_state)
current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab += nr_freed;
- __free_memcg_kmem_pages(page, cachep->gfporder);
+ __free_pages(page, cachep->gfporder);
+ memcg_uncharge_slab(cachep, cachep->gfporder);
}
static void kmem_rcu_free(struct rcu_head *head)
diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
index f3cfccf76dda..6673597ac967 100644
--- a/mm/slab_common.c
+++ b/mm/slab_common.c
@@ -290,12 +290,8 @@ void kmem_cache_create_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct kmem_cache *root_c
root_cache->size, root_cache->align,
root_cache->flags, root_cache->ctor,
memcg, root_cache);
- if (IS_ERR(s)) {
+ if (IS_ERR(s))
kfree(cache_name);
- goto out_unlock;
- }
-
- s->allocflags |= __GFP_KMEMCG;
out_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index c2e58a787443..6fefe3b33ce0 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1317,17 +1317,26 @@ static inline void slab_free_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, void *x)
/*
* Slab allocation and freeing
*/
-static inline struct page *alloc_slab_page(gfp_t flags, int node,
- struct kmem_cache_order_objects oo)
+static inline struct page *alloc_slab_page(struct kmem_cache *s,
+ gfp_t flags, int node, struct kmem_cache_order_objects oo)
{
+ struct page *page;
int order = oo_order(oo);
flags |= __GFP_NOTRACK;
+ if (memcg_charge_slab(s, flags, order))
+ return NULL;
+
if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
- return alloc_pages(flags, order);
+ page = alloc_pages(flags, order);
else
- return alloc_pages_exact_node(node, flags, order);
+ page = alloc_pages_exact_node(node, flags, order);
+
+ if (!page)
+ memcg_uncharge_slab(s, order);
+
+ return page;
}
static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
@@ -1349,7 +1358,7 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
*/
alloc_gfp = (flags | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY) & ~__GFP_NOFAIL;
- page = alloc_slab_page(alloc_gfp, node, oo);
+ page = alloc_slab_page(s, alloc_gfp, node, oo);
if (unlikely(!page)) {
oo = s->min;
alloc_gfp = flags;
@@ -1357,7 +1366,7 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
* Allocation may have failed due to fragmentation.
* Try a lower order alloc if possible
*/
- page = alloc_slab_page(alloc_gfp, node, oo);
+ page = alloc_slab_page(s, alloc_gfp, node, oo);
if (page)
stat(s, ORDER_FALLBACK);
@@ -1473,7 +1482,8 @@ static void __free_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page)
page_mapcount_reset(page);
if (current->reclaim_state)
current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab += pages;
- __free_memcg_kmem_pages(page, order);
+ __free_pages(page, order);
+ memcg_uncharge_slab(s, order);
}
#define need_reserve_slab_rcu \
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists