[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140326172332.5f1e1bfb@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 17:23:32 +0000
From: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, pmladek@...e.cz,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] printk: Add config option for disabling printk
offloading
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 18:55:01 +0100
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
> Necessity for offloading of printing was observed only for large
> systems. So add a config option (disabled by default) which removes most
> of the overhead added by this functionality.
If its an option it'll not get used. It ought to be automatic.
I still think the mindset of this patch set is wrong. Only the device
driver really knows what is good or bad. A large x86 connected to a
network fake 16x50 serial port for example typically has a giant FIFO so
'bad' becomes 32K not 1000. A USB serial port already does async queueing
so the value is 0.
It also ignores priority so you might queue and loose an oops as a box
goes down in preference to reporting debugging crap.
All the afflicted consoles are serial, all go via the uart layer as far
as I can see.
The uart layer has a queue mechanism that could be used
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists