linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][v5] netlink: have netlink per-protocol bind function return an error code.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140326.155258.685120737486107362.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:52:58 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	rgb@...hat.com
Cc:	linux-audit@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	eparis@...hat.com, sgrubb@...hat.com, hadi@...atatu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v5] netlink: have netlink per-protocol bind function
 return an error code.

From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:59:23 -0400

> +				if (err)
> +					if (!nlk->portid)
> +						netlink_remove(sk);
> +					for (int undo = 0; undo < i; undo++)
> +						if (nlk->netlink_unbind)
> +							nlk->netlink_unbind(undo);
> +					return err;

Take a good long stare at that code block for a while.

Looks like you forgot the braces to delineate the code block.

This also means you really haven't tested this patch :-)

Please also DO NOT declare local variables in a for() statement,
this is not c++.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/