[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1395873117.12610.269.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:31:57 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Vijay Subramanian <subramanian.vijay@...il.com>
Cc: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] atm: replace del_timer by del_timer_sync
On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 15:19 -0700, Vijay Subramanian wrote:
> >
> > It seems this timer rearms itself, so this patch wont be enough I fear.
> >
> >
> >
> Does that matter? It seems del_timer_sync() may be intended to work
> despite this (i.e. timer will not fire after call to this function).
> My earlier attempt to fix a similar issue in sch_red.c resulted in
> this explanation.
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg256410.html
I know this very well, thank you.
If documentation is stale, it needs clarification.
If not, we need to make sure timer wont be restarted.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists