[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <533271BA.5000007@atmel.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 14:20:42 +0800
From: Josh Wu <josh.wu@...el.com>
To: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
CC: <g.liakhovetski@....de>, <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [media] ov2640: add support for async device registration
Hi, Sylwester
On 3/20/2014 10:44 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> On 19/03/14 10:17, Josh Wu wrote:
>> On 3/15/2014 5:17 AM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>>>> On 03/14/2014 11:12 AM, Josh Wu wrote:
>>>>>> + clk = v4l2_clk_get(&client->dev, "mclk");
>>>>>> + if (IS_ERR(clk))
>>>>>> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>>>> You should instead make it:
>>>>
>>>> return PTR_ERR(clk);
>>>>
>>>> But you will need this patch for that to work:
>>>> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/drivers/clk/clk.c?id=a34cd4666f3da84228a82f70c94b8d9b692034ea
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> With this patch there is no need to overwrite any returned error
>>>> value with EPROBE_DEFER.
>> Thanks for the information. I will use this in v2 version.
> Oops, I missed somehow that it's v4l2_clk_get(), rather than
> clk_get(). So it seems it will not work when you return PTR_ERR(clk),
> since v4l2_clk_get() returns -ENODEV when clock is not found.
right, I missed that. So this version is still valid one. The v2 that I
already sent should be dropped.
> I think we should modify v4l2_clk_get() so it returns EPROBE_DEFER
> rather than ENODEV on error. I anticipate v4l2_clk_get() might be
> using clk_get() internally in future, and the v4l2 clk look up
> will be used as a fallback only. So sensor drivers should just
> do something like:
>
> clk = v4l2_clk_get(...);
> if (IS_ERR(clk))
> return PTR_ERR(clk);
I noticed that there are some driver like ov772x, ov9640 and etc, are
not supported the async probe yet.
If we return the EPROBE_DEFER for all v4l2_clk_get(), that will cause
the no-async probe function work incorrectly.
So IMO we can do your above suggestion after all sensors support async
probe.
Thanks.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Sylwester
Best Regards,
Josh Wu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists