linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm 3/4] fork: charge threadinfo to memcg explicitly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5333D5A6.8090409@parallels.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Mar 2014 11:39:18 +0400
From:	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
CC:	<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	<glommer@...il.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 3/4] fork: charge threadinfo to memcg explicitly

On 03/27/2014 02:00 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 26-03-14 19:28:06, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
>> We have only a few places where we actually want to charge kmem so
>> instead of intruding into the general page allocation path with
>> __GFP_KMEMCG it's better to explictly charge kmem there. All kmem
>> charges will be easier to follow that way.
>>
>> This is a step toward removing __GFP_KMEMCG. It makes fork charge task
>> threadinfo pages explicitly instead of passing __GFP_KMEMCG to
>> alloc_pages.
> Looks good from a quick glance. I would also remove
> THREADINFO_GFP_ACCOUNTED in this patch.

To do so,  I'd have to remove __GFP_KMEMCG check from
memcg_kmem_newpage_charge, which is better to do in the next patch,
which removes __GFP_KMEMCG everywhere, IMO.

Thanks.

>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
>> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
>> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
>> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  kernel/fork.c |   13 ++++++++++---
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
>> index f4b09bc15f3a..8209780cf732 100644
>> --- a/kernel/fork.c
>> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
>> @@ -150,15 +150,22 @@ void __weak arch_release_thread_info(struct thread_info *ti)
>>  static struct thread_info *alloc_thread_info_node(struct task_struct *tsk,
>>  						  int node)
>>  {
>> -	struct page *page = alloc_pages_node(node, THREADINFO_GFP_ACCOUNTED,
>> -					     THREAD_SIZE_ORDER);
>> +	struct page *page;
>> +	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
>>  
>> +	if (!memcg_kmem_newpage_charge(THREADINFO_GFP_ACCOUNTED, &memcg,
>> +				       THREAD_SIZE_ORDER))
>> +		return NULL;
>> +	page = alloc_pages_node(node, THREADINFO_GFP, THREAD_SIZE_ORDER);
>> +	memcg_kmem_commit_charge(page, memcg, THREAD_SIZE_ORDER);
>>  	return page ? page_address(page) : NULL;
>>  }
>>  
>>  static inline void free_thread_info(struct thread_info *ti)
>>  {
>> -	free_memcg_kmem_pages((unsigned long)ti, THREAD_SIZE_ORDER);
>> +	if (ti)
>> +		memcg_kmem_uncharge_pages(virt_to_page(ti), THREAD_SIZE_ORDER);
>> +	free_pages((unsigned long)ti, THREAD_SIZE_ORDER);
>>  }
>>  # else
>>  static struct kmem_cache *thread_info_cache;
>> -- 
>> 1.7.10.4
>>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/