lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpokLD35f7hgmhWk+7kAqnWem1qRd-P8xMeVPvdeQ51VFjw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Mar 2014 10:00:50 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Linaro Networking <linaro-networking@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] hrtimer: remove active_bases field from struct hrtimer_cpu_base

On 26 March 2014 22:58, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> Instead of removing it we should actually use ffs and avoid the whole
> looping. That was the intention in the first place, but I never wrote
> the patch...

I thought about that and then using ffs for a field of which only 4 bits
are useful didn't looked too convincing to me :)

But, probably it will make things slightly better in case this routine is
heavily used.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ