[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140328100403.GA21330@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 10:04:06 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] kmemleak: free internal objects only if there're
no leaks to be reported
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 08:52:26AM +0000, Li Zefan wrote:
> Currently if you disabling kmemleak after stopping kmemleak thread,
> kmemleak objects will be freed and so you won't be able to check
> previously reported leaks.
>
> With this patch, kmemleak objects won't be freed if there're leaks
> that can be reported.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
Some nitpicks below:
> diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
> index 31f01c5..be7ecc0 100644
> --- a/mm/kmemleak.c
> +++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
> @@ -218,7 +218,8 @@ static int kmemleak_stack_scan = 1;
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(scan_mutex);
> /* setting kmemleak=on, will set this var, skipping the disable */
> static int kmemleak_skip_disable;
> -
> +/* If there're leaks that can be reported */
"If there are ..." (easier to read ;)).
> +static bool kmemleak_has_leaks;
Better "kmemleak_found_leaks" to avoid confusion.
Otherwise:
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists