[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpo=L8ZiR67OR0Sz0LeGdRxn92rfbJbsHd-ybt==MwfQJ3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:13:18 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Linaro Networking <linaro-networking@...aro.org>
Subject: [Query]: hrtimer: Does switch_hrtimer_base() need to check hrtimer_check_target()?
Hi Thomas,
I couldn't understand one part of hrtimer (obviously there are
others as well, but here I am sure I couldn't understood it :)).
In switch_hrtimer_base() we are calling hrtimer_check_target()
which guarantees this:
/*
* With HIGHRES=y we do not migrate the timer when it is expiring
* before the next event on the target cpu because we cannot reprogram
* the target cpu hardware and we would cause it to fire late.
*
* Called with cpu_base->lock of target cpu held.
*/
But switch_hrtimer_base() is only called from one place, i.e.
__hrtimer_start_range_ns() and at the point (where we call
switch_hrtimer_base()) expiration time is not yet known as
we call this routine later:
hrtimer_set_expires_range_ns()
So, do we really need to call hrtimer_check_target() at all
in switch_hrtimer_base()? Or do we need to move
hrtimer_set_expires_range_ns() before calling
switch_hrtimer_base() ??
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists