[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140328173138.614802884@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 10:32:13 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Markus Pargmann <mpa@...gutronix.de>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.13 29/46] regulator: core: Replace direct ops->disable usage
3.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Markus Pargmann <mpa@...gutronix.de>
commit 66fda75f47dc583f1c187556e9a2c082dd64f8c6 upstream.
There are many places where ops->disable is called directly. Instead we
should use _regulator_do_disable() which also handles gpio regulators.
To be able to use the wrapper function from _regulator_force_disable(),
I moved the _notifier_call_chain() call from _regulator_do_disable() to
_regulator_disable(). This way, _regulator_force_disable() can use
different flags for _notifier_call_chain() without calling it twice.
Signed-off-by: Markus Pargmann <mpa@...gutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 34 +++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -1908,8 +1908,6 @@ static int _regulator_do_disable(struct
trace_regulator_disable_complete(rdev_get_name(rdev));
- _notifier_call_chain(rdev, REGULATOR_EVENT_DISABLE,
- NULL);
return 0;
}
@@ -1933,6 +1931,8 @@ static int _regulator_disable(struct reg
rdev_err(rdev, "failed to disable\n");
return ret;
}
+ _notifier_call_chain(rdev, REGULATOR_EVENT_DISABLE,
+ NULL);
}
rdev->use_count = 0;
@@ -1985,20 +1985,16 @@ static int _regulator_force_disable(stru
{
int ret = 0;
- /* force disable */
- if (rdev->desc->ops->disable) {
- /* ah well, who wants to live forever... */
- ret = rdev->desc->ops->disable(rdev);
- if (ret < 0) {
- rdev_err(rdev, "failed to force disable\n");
- return ret;
- }
- /* notify other consumers that power has been forced off */
- _notifier_call_chain(rdev, REGULATOR_EVENT_FORCE_DISABLE |
- REGULATOR_EVENT_DISABLE, NULL);
+ ret = _regulator_do_disable(rdev);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ rdev_err(rdev, "failed to force disable\n");
+ return ret;
}
- return ret;
+ _notifier_call_chain(rdev, REGULATOR_EVENT_FORCE_DISABLE |
+ REGULATOR_EVENT_DISABLE, NULL);
+
+ return 0;
}
/**
@@ -3631,8 +3627,6 @@ int regulator_suspend_finish(void)
mutex_lock(®ulator_list_mutex);
list_for_each_entry(rdev, ®ulator_list, list) {
- struct regulator_ops *ops = rdev->desc->ops;
-
mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex);
if (rdev->use_count > 0 || rdev->constraints->always_on) {
error = _regulator_do_enable(rdev);
@@ -3641,12 +3635,10 @@ int regulator_suspend_finish(void)
} else {
if (!have_full_constraints())
goto unlock;
- if (!ops->disable)
- goto unlock;
if (!_regulator_is_enabled(rdev))
goto unlock;
- error = ops->disable(rdev);
+ error = _regulator_do_disable(rdev);
if (error)
ret = error;
}
@@ -3820,7 +3812,7 @@ static int __init regulator_init_complet
ops = rdev->desc->ops;
c = rdev->constraints;
- if (!ops->disable || (c && c->always_on))
+ if (c && c->always_on)
continue;
mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex);
@@ -3841,7 +3833,7 @@ static int __init regulator_init_complet
/* We log since this may kill the system if it
* goes wrong. */
rdev_info(rdev, "disabling\n");
- ret = ops->disable(rdev);
+ ret = _regulator_do_disable(rdev);
if (ret != 0) {
rdev_err(rdev, "couldn't disable: %d\n", ret);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists