[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140328145027.fef73dc688be565c6a6e9210@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 14:50:27 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm-soc tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c between commit 016f4dcae81e ("ARM: zynq:
Split slcr in two parts") from the arm-soc tree and commit cd325295871f
("arm: zynq: Add support for cpufreq") from the tip tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c
index dca60d5ba756,a39be8e80856..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c
@@@ -73,8 -74,7 +75,9 @@@ static void __init zynq_init_machine(vo
of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL);
platform_device_register(&zynq_cpuidle_device);
+ platform_device_register_full(&devinfo);
+
+ zynq_slcr_init();
}
static void __init zynq_timer_init(void)
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists