[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140328225139.GC29200@katana>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 23:51:39 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
"Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] i2c: New bus driver for the Qualcomm QUP I2C
controller
> General i2c question: is there a reason why the core isn't responsible
> for ensuring a device is not suspended before invoking ->master_xfer
> (and smbus_xfer)?
Can't think of one right now.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists