[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140328071716.GC30107@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 08:17:16 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: hpet: Don't default CONFIG_HPET_TIMER to be y
for X86_64
* Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com> wrote:
> On many new phone/tablet platforms like Baytrail/Merrifield etc, the
> HPET are either defeatured or has some problem to be used as a
> reliable timer. As these platforms also have X86_64, we should not
> make HPET_TIMER default y for all X86_64.
NAK!
If the HPET is unreliable on a specific platform then any of the
following solutions would address the problem (in order of
preference):
- the hardware should not expose it. Why waste silicon on something
that does not work?
- or the firmware should not expose it. Why expose something that
does not work?
- or the kernel should have a quirk to reliably disable it. Why
should we crash or misbehave if a driver is built into the
kernel?
tweaking a default is _NOT_ a solution for an unreliable hpet.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists