lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 29 Mar 2014 10:12:54 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <>
Cc:	Thomas Petazzoni <>,
	Boris BREZILLON <>,,,
	Nicolas Ferre <>,, Rob Landley <>,
	Thomas Gleixner <>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/10] ARM: at91: introduce OLD_IRQ_AT91 Kconfig option

On Saturday 29 March 2014 10:06:39 Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Boris BREZILLON,
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2014 18:59:01 +0100, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> > +config OLD_IRQ_AT91
> > +     bool
> > +     default false
> I don't think "default false" is a valid Kconfig construct. It could be
> "default n", but that's useless since "default n" is the default
> behavior. So I believe you can simply get rid of that line.

I think the above is syntactically correct, but it would be highly confusing in
anyone ever does

config false
	def_bool y


Aside from that, these three have completely identical meaning:

config OLD_IRQ_AT91

config OLD_IRQ_AT91
	def_bool n

config OLD_IRQ_AT91
	default n


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists