[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1396142606.21529.9.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 18:23:26 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Jérôme Pinot <ngc891@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Chris Kelly <ckelly@...odevices.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] staging/ozwpan: coding style ether_addr_copy
On Sun, 2014-03-30 at 02:29 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> These days in the kernel we treat checkpatch.pl and GCC
> warnings the same so it sucks when they are something conditional.
Treating checkpatch messages like gcc compilation warnings
and failures has got to change.
There is _no way_ checkpatch can have no false positives.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists