[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1396221815.1132591@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 00:23:35 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Maximilian Attems" <maks@...o.at>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 005/200] parport: parport_pc: remove double PCI ID for
NetMos
3.2.56-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
commit d6a484520c5572a4170fa915109ccfc0c38f5008 upstream.
In commit 85747f ("PATCH] parport: add NetMOS 9805 support") Max added
the PCI ID for NetMOS 9805 based on a Debian bug report from 2k4 which
was at the v2.4.26 time frame. The patch made into 2.6.14.
Shortly before that patch akpm merged commit 296d3c783b ("[PATCH] Support
NetMOS based PCI cards providing serial and parallel ports") which made
into v2.6.9-rc1.
Now we have two different entries for the same PCI id.
I have here the NetMos 9805 which claims to support SPP/EPP/ECP mode.
This patch takes Max's entry for titan_1284p1 (base != -1 specifies the
ioport for ECP mode) and replaces akpm's entry for netmos_9805 which
specified -1 (=none). Both share the same PCI-ID (my card has subsystem
0x1000 / 0x0020 so it should match PCI_ANY).
While here I also drop the entry for titan_1284p2 which is the same as
netmos_9815.
Cc: Maximilian Attems <maks@...o.at>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
drivers/parport/parport_pc.c | 10 ++--------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c
+++ b/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c
@@ -2875,8 +2875,6 @@ enum parport_pc_pci_cards {
syba_2p_epp,
syba_1p_ecp,
titan_010l,
- titan_1284p1,
- titan_1284p2,
avlab_1p,
avlab_2p,
oxsemi_952,
@@ -2935,8 +2933,6 @@ static struct parport_pc_pci {
/* syba_2p_epp AP138B */ { 2, { { 0, 0x078 }, { 0, 0x178 }, } },
/* syba_1p_ecp W83787 */ { 1, { { 0, 0x078 }, } },
/* titan_010l */ { 1, { { 3, -1 }, } },
- /* titan_1284p1 */ { 1, { { 0, 1 }, } },
- /* titan_1284p2 */ { 2, { { 0, 1 }, { 2, 3 }, } },
/* avlab_1p */ { 1, { { 0, 1}, } },
/* avlab_2p */ { 2, { { 0, 1}, { 2, 3 },} },
/* The Oxford Semi cards are unusual: 954 doesn't support ECP,
@@ -2952,8 +2948,8 @@ static struct parport_pc_pci {
/* netmos_9705 */ { 1, { { 0, -1 }, } },
/* netmos_9715 */ { 2, { { 0, 1 }, { 2, 3 },} },
/* netmos_9755 */ { 2, { { 0, 1 }, { 2, 3 },} },
- /* netmos_9805 */ { 1, { { 0, -1 }, } },
- /* netmos_9815 */ { 2, { { 0, -1 }, { 2, -1 }, } },
+ /* netmos_9805 */ { 1, { { 0, 1 }, } },
+ /* netmos_9815 */ { 2, { { 0, 1 }, { 2, 3 }, } },
/* netmos_9901 */ { 1, { { 0, -1 }, } },
/* netmos_9865 */ { 1, { { 0, -1 }, } },
/* quatech_sppxp100 */ { 1, { { 0, 1 }, } },
@@ -2997,8 +2993,6 @@ static const struct pci_device_id parpor
PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, syba_1p_ecp },
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_TITAN, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TITAN_010L,
PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, titan_010l },
- { 0x9710, 0x9805, 0x1000, 0x0010, 0, 0, titan_1284p1 },
- { 0x9710, 0x9815, 0x1000, 0x0020, 0, 0, titan_1284p2 },
/* PCI_VENDOR_ID_AVLAB/Intek21 has another bunch of cards ...*/
/* AFAVLAB_TK9902 */
{ 0x14db, 0x2120, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, avlab_1p},
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists