lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 31 Mar 2014 00:23:35 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	"Emmanuel Grumbach" <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>,
	"Johannes Berg" <johannes.berg@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 147/200] iwlwifi: fix TX status for aggregated packets

3.2.56-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>

commit 143582c6847cb285b361804c613127c25de60ca4 upstream.

Only the first packet is currently handled correctly, but then
all others are assumed to have failed which is problematic. Fix
this, marking them all successful instead (since if they're not
then the firmware will have transmitted them as single frames.)

This fixes the lost packet reporting.

Also do a tiny variable scoping cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
[Add the dvm part]
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2:
 - Drop the mvm part
 - Adjust filename, context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-tx.c
@@ -854,8 +854,6 @@ int iwlagn_rx_reply_compressed_ba(struct
 	struct iwl_compressed_ba_resp *ba_resp = &pkt->u.compressed_ba;
 	struct iwl_ht_agg *agg;
 	struct sk_buff_head reclaimed_skbs;
-	struct ieee80211_tx_info *info;
-	struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr;
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int sta_id;
@@ -941,24 +939,32 @@ int iwlagn_rx_reply_compressed_ba(struct
 			  0, &reclaimed_skbs);
 	freed = 0;
 	while (!skb_queue_empty(&reclaimed_skbs)) {
+		struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr;
+		struct ieee80211_tx_info *info;
 
 		skb = __skb_dequeue(&reclaimed_skbs);
-		hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *)skb->data;
+		hdr = (void *)skb->data;
+		info = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb);
 
 		if (ieee80211_is_data_qos(hdr->frame_control))
 			freed++;
 		else
 			WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
 
-		info = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb);
 		kmem_cache_free(priv->tx_cmd_pool, (info->driver_data[1]));
 
+		memset(&info->status, 0, sizeof(info->status));
+		/* Packet was transmitted successfully, failures come as single
+		 * frames because before failing a frame the firmware transmits
+		 * it without aggregation at least once.
+		 */
+		info->flags |= IEEE80211_TX_STAT_ACK;
+
 		if (freed == 1) {
 			/* this is the first skb we deliver in this batch */
 			/* put the rate scaling data there */
 			info = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb);
 			memset(&info->status, 0, sizeof(info->status));
-			info->flags |= IEEE80211_TX_STAT_ACK;
 			info->flags |= IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU;
 			info->status.ampdu_ack_len = ba_resp->txed_2_done;
 			info->status.ampdu_len = ba_resp->txed;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists