[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5337DC2E.5040000@broadcom.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 10:56:14 +0200
From: Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
CC: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] dt: bindings: add bindings for Broadcom bcm43xx sdio devices
On 02/13/14 10:28, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Tomasz Figa<tomasz.figa@...il.com> wrote:
>> Hi Arend,
>>
>>
>> On 10.02.2014 20:17, Arend van Spriel wrote:
[...]
>>> +
>>> +Example:
>>> +
>>> +mmc3: mmc@...20000 {
>>> + pinctrl-0 =<&mmc3_pins>;
>>> + pinctrl-1 =<&wifi_host_wake>;
>>
>>
>> WLAN_HOST_WAKE pin (aka the OOB interrupt) is specific to the WLAN chip, so
>> this should be rather configured in a pinctrl state of the WLAN chip itself.
Hi Chen-Yu,
picking up this thread.
> AFAIK, the pinctrl in tied to the device node, and is selected when the device
> is registered. The MMC subsystem currently does not register child nodes, so
> this would be useless.
So if MMC does not register child nodes, brcmfmac will not be probed
with of_node set? Have there been patches submitted for this in mmc
subsystem recently.
> brcmfmac actually has to walk the whole DT to find the node with the right
> compatible.
Is it just me or should this be avoided? What if there are multiple entries?
Regards,
Arend
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists