linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 08/29] ktap: add bytecode reader(kernel/trace/ktap/kp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140330171703.GE22728@two.firstfloor.org>
Date:	Sun, 30 Mar 2014 19:17:03 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Jovi Zhangwei <jovi.zhangwei@...il.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/29] ktap: add bytecode
 reader(kernel/trace/ktap/kp_bcread.[c|h])

> That's designed for portability initially, it means we can just run bytecode
> without compile script file everywhere, especially when compilation  is
> a heavily task for some embedded platform, even though ktap compilation
> is extremely fast.
> 
> I doubt maybe there will have this bytecode portability requirement in future?

Portability should be on the source level.

-Andi

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/