linux-kernel - RE: 3.0 -> 3.10 regression? poweroff instead of reboot?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B1AFAE58E@HASMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:05:20 +0000
From:	"Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
To:	Nikola Ciprich <nikola.ciprich@...uxbox.cz>,
	"Greg KH (gregkh@...uxfoundation.org)" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: 3.0 -> 3.10 regression? poweroff instead of reboot?


> 
> Hi Tomas,
> 
> > If this is a server platform can you please try this patch
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/25/396
> 
> tried 3.10.35 with Your patch and now I can see following in dmesg:
> 
> [  +0.000290] mei_me 0000:00:16.0: Device doesn't have valid ME Interface
> [  +0.007656] mei_me 0000:00:16.0: initialization failed.
> 
> now reboot works as expected. Once this hits ustream (if it hasn't already),
> this could go to -stable, do You agree?
> 
> thanks!
> 
I definitely asked for adding it to stable. Would you wish to add you tested-by to the patch?. 
Tomas

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/