lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140331153813.GL4284@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 31 Mar 2014 08:38:13 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc:	fweisbec@...il.com, peterz@...radead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Promela/spin model for NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE code

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 02:02:23PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
> > Cc: fweisbec@...il.com, peterz@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2014 11:54:58 PM
> > Subject: Re: Promela/spin model for NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE code
> > 
> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 03:29:25AM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > > To: fweisbec@...il.com, "mathieu desnoyers"
> > > > <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, peterz@...radead.org
> > > > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > > > Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2014 7:08:56 PM
> > > > Subject: Promela/spin model for NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE code
> > > > 
> > > > For whatever it is worth, the following model claims safety and progress
> > > > for the sysidle state machine.
> > > > 
> > > > Thoughts?
> > > 
> > > Hi Paul,
> > > 
> > > Please keep in mind that it's been a while since I've looked at Promela
> > > proofs, but a couple of questions come to mind. First, how is the execution
> > > script below checking for progress in any way ? I remember that we used
> > > the negation of a "_np" LTL claim to check for progress in the past.
> > > Moreover, I'd be much more comfortable seeing ifdefs in the code that
> > > inject
> > > known failures, and let them be triggered by error-triggering runs in the
> > > scripts (with e.g. -DINJECT_ERROR_XYZ), to confirm that this model actually
> > > catches known issues.
> > 
> > Well, if I comment out the four "progress_" labels, it complains about
> > a non-progress cycle.  So at least spin does pay attention to these.  ;-)
> > 
> > If I put the "progress_" labels back in, but change the check so as to
> > prevent the state machine from ever entering RCU_SYSIDLE_FULL_NOTED,
> > it cranks through 14M states before complaining about a non-progress cycle,
> > as expected.
> > 
> > If I revert back to pristine state, and then comment out the statements
> > that reverts state back to RCU_SYSIDLE_NOT when exiting idle, an assert()
> > triggers, as expected.
> > 
> > > If we can show that the model can detect a few failure modes, both for
> > > safety
> > > and progress, then my confidence level in the model will start to improve.
> > > ;-)
> > 
> > Well, there probably is a bug in there somewhere, Murphy being who he is.
> > ;-)
> 
> One failure mode your model seems to miss is when I comment the wakeup:
> 
>                 /* If needed, wake up the timekeeper. */
>                 if
> #ifndef INJECT_NO_WAKEUP
>                 :: oldstate == RCU_SYSIDLE_FULL_NOTED ->
>                         wakeup_timekeeper = 1;
> #endif /* #ifndef INJECT_NO_WAKEUP */
>                 :: else -> skip;
>                 fi;
> 
> Somehow, I feel I am doing something very nasty to the algorithm,
> but the model checker fails to find any kind of progress or safety
> issue. Any idea why ?

Hmmm...  One reason is because I am not modeling the timekeeper thread
as waiting for the wakeup.  Let me see what I can do about that...

							Thanx, Paul

> Thanks,
> 
> Mathieu
> 
> 
> > 
> > 							Thanx, Paul
> > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > Mathieu
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 							Thanx, Paul
> > > > 
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > sysidle.sh
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > spin -a sysidle.spin
> > > > cc -DNP -o pan pan.c
> > > > # Fair scheduling to focus progress checks in timekeeper.
> > > > ./pan -f -l -m1280000 -w22
> > > > 
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > sysidle.spin
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > /*
> > > >  * Promela model for CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE=y in the Linux kernel.
> > > >  * This model assumes that the dyntick-idle bit manipulation works based
> > > >  * on long usage, and substitutes a per-thread boolean "am_busy[]" array
> > > >  * for the Linux kernel's dyntick-idle masks.  The focus of this model
> > > >  * is therefore on the state machine itself.  Checks for both safety and
> > > >  * forward progress.
> > > >  *
> > > >  * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> > > >  * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> > > >  * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> > > >  * (at your option) any later version.
> > > >  *
> > > >  * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> > > >  * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> > > >  * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> > > >  * GNU General Public License for more details.
> > > >  *
> > > >  * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> > > >  * along with this program; if not, you can access it online at
> > > >  * http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html.
> > > >  *
> > > >  * Copyright IBM Corporation, 2014
> > > >  *
> > > >  * Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > >  */
> > > > 
> > > > #define NUM_WORKERS 3
> > > > 
> > > > byte wakeup_timekeeper = 0; /* Models rcu_kick_nohz_cpu(). */
> > > > 
> > > > #define RCU_SYSIDLE_NOT		0	/* Some CPU is not idle. */
> > > > #define RCU_SYSIDLE_SHORT	1	/* All CPUs idle for brief period. */
> > > > #define RCU_SYSIDLE_LONG	2	/* All CPUs idle for long enough. */
> > > > #define RCU_SYSIDLE_FULL	3	/* All CPUs idle, ready for sysidle. */
> > > > #define RCU_SYSIDLE_FULL_NOTED	4	/* Actually entered sysidle state. */
> > > > 
> > > > byte full_sysidle_state = RCU_SYSIDLE_NOT;
> > > > 
> > > > byte am_busy[NUM_WORKERS];  /* Busy is similar to "not dyntick-idle". */
> > > > byte am_setup[NUM_WORKERS]; /* Setup means timekeeper knows I am not
> > > > idle. */
> > > > 
> > > > /*
> > > >  * Non-timekeeping CPU going into and out of dyntick-idle state.
> > > >  */
> > > > proctype worker(byte me)
> > > > {
> > > > 	byte oldstate;
> > > > 
> > > > 	do
> > > > 	:: 1 ->
> > > > 		/* Go idle. */
> > > > 		am_setup[me] = 0;
> > > > 		am_busy[me] = 0;
> > > > 
> > > > 		/* Dyntick-idle in the following loop. */
> > > > 		do
> > > > 		:: 1 -> skip;
> > > > 		:: 1 -> break;
> > > > 		od;
> > > > 
> > > > 		/* Exit idle loop, model getting out of dyntick idle state. */
> > > > 		am_busy[me] = 1;
> > > > 
> > > > 		/* Get state out of full-system idle states. */
> > > > 		atomic {
> > > > 			oldstate = full_sysidle_state;
> > > > 			if
> > > > 			:: oldstate > RCU_SYSIDLE_SHORT ->
> > > > 				full_sysidle_state = RCU_SYSIDLE_NOT;
> > > > 			:: else -> skip;
> > > > 			fi;
> > > > 		}
> > > > 
> > > > 		/* If needed, wake up the timekeeper. */
> > > > 		if
> > > > 		:: oldstate == RCU_SYSIDLE_FULL_NOTED ->
> > > > 			wakeup_timekeeper = 1;
> > > > 		:: else -> skip;
> > > > 		fi;
> > > > 
> > > > 		/* Mark ourselves fully awake and operational. */
> > > > 		am_setup[me] = 1;
> > > > 
> > > > 		/* We are fully awake, so timekeeper must not be asleep. */
> > > > 		assert(full_sysidle_state < RCU_SYSIDLE_FULL);
> > > > 
> > > > 		/* Running in kernel in the following loop. */
> > > > 		do
> > > > 		:: 1 -> skip;
> > > > 		:: 1 -> break;
> > > > 		od;
> > > > 	od
> > > > }
> > > > 
> > > > /*
> > > >  * Are all the workers in dyntick-idle state?
> > > >  */
> > > > #define check_idle() \
> > > > 	i = 0; \
> > > > 	idle = 1; \
> > > > 	do \
> > > > 	:: i < NUM_WORKERS -> \
> > > > 		if \
> > > > 		:: am_busy[i] == 1 -> idle = 0; \
> > > > 		:: else -> skip; \
> > > > 		fi; \
> > > > 		i++; \
> > > > 	:: i >= NUM_WORKERS -> break; \
> > > > 	od
> > > > 
> > > > /*
> > > >  * Timekeeping CPU.
> > > >  */
> > > > proctype timekeeper()
> > > > {
> > > > 	byte i;
> > > > 	byte idle;
> > > > 	byte curstate;
> > > > 	byte newstate;
> > > > 
> > > > 	do
> > > > 	:: 1 ->
> > > > 		/* Capture current state. */
> > > > 		check_idle();
> > > > 		curstate = full_sysidle_state;
> > > > 		newstate = curstate;
> > > > 
> > > > 		/* Check for acceptance state. */
> > > > 		if
> > > > 		:: idle == 0 ->
> > > > progress_idle:
> > > > 			skip;
> > > > 		:: curstate == RCU_SYSIDLE_NOT ->
> > > > progress_idle_reset:
> > > > 			skip;
> > > > 		:: else -> skip;
> > > > 		fi;
> > > > 
> > > > 		/* Manage state... */
> > > > 		if
> > > > 		:: idle == 1 && curstate < RCU_SYSIDLE_FULL_NOTED ->
> > > > 			/* Idle, advance to next state. */
> > > > 			atomic {
> > > > 				if
> > > > 				:: full_sysidle_state == curstate ->
> > > > 					newstate = curstate + 1;
> > > > 					full_sysidle_state = newstate;
> > > > 				:: else -> skip;
> > > > 				fi;
> > > > 			}
> > > > 		:: idle == 0 && full_sysidle_state >= RCU_SYSIDLE_LONG ->
> > > > 			/* Non-idle and state advanced, revert to base state. */
> > > > 			full_sysidle_state = RCU_SYSIDLE_NOT;
> > > > 		:: else -> skip;
> > > > 		fi;
> > > > 
> > > > 		/* If in RCU_SYSIDLE_FULL_NOTED, wait to be awakened. */
> > > > 		do
> > > > 		:: newstate != RCU_SYSIDLE_FULL_NOTED &&
> > > > 		   wakeup_timekeeper == 1 ->
> > > > 			assert(0); /* Should never get here. */
> > > > 		:: newstate != RCU_SYSIDLE_FULL_NOTED &&
> > > > 		   wakeup_timekeeper == 0 ->
> > > > 			break;
> > > > 		:: newstate == RCU_SYSIDLE_FULL_NOTED &&
> > > > 		   wakeup_timekeeper == 1 ->
> > > > progress_full_system_idle_1:
> > > > 			assert(full_sysidle_state == RCU_SYSIDLE_NOT);
> > > > 		   	wakeup_timekeeper = 0;
> > > > 			break;
> > > > 		:: newstate == RCU_SYSIDLE_FULL_NOTED &&
> > > > 		   wakeup_timekeeper == 0 ->
> > > > progress_full_system_idle_2:
> > > > 
> > > > 			/* We are asleep, so all workers better be idle. */
> > > > 			atomic {
> > > > 				i = 0;
> > > > 				idle = 1;
> > > > 				do
> > > > 				:: i < NUM_WORKERS ->
> > > > 					if
> > > > 					:: am_setup[i] -> idle = 0;
> > > > 					:: else -> skip;
> > > > 					fi;
> > > > 					i++;
> > > > 				:: i >= NUM_WORKERS -> break;
> > > > 				od;
> > > > 				assert(idle == 1 ||
> > > > 				       full_sysidle_state < RCU_SYSIDLE_FULL);
> > > > 			}
> > > > 		od;
> > > > 		assert(full_sysidle_state <= RCU_SYSIDLE_FULL_NOTED);
> > > > 	od;
> > > > }
> > > > 
> > > > init {
> > > > 	byte i = 0;
> > > > 
> > > > 	do
> > > > 	:: i < NUM_WORKERS ->
> > > > 		am_busy[i] = 1;
> > > > 		am_setup[i] = 1;
> > > > 		run worker(i);
> > > > 		i++;
> > > > 	:: i >= NUM_WORKERS -> break;
> > > > 	od;
> > > > 	run timekeeper();
> > > > }
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Mathieu Desnoyers
> > > EfficiOS Inc.
> > > http://www.efficios.com
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Mathieu Desnoyers
> EfficiOS Inc.
> http://www.efficios.com
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ