lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwdosGtoh8=krpx9C-fT-H7OHsC0UVyXc8aNE7h=W1RxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 31 Mar 2014 11:37:07 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: update_rq_clock() must skip ONE update

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Mike Galbraith
<umgwanakikbuti@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Oh, I didn't cc you because I wanted it applied instantly as ultra
> critical, only because the chain of events might be of interest.

Ok. That was my main worry, since I was in the process or releasing
3.14, and I just couldn't tell if the patch was something I should
worry about or not.

And it seems that not applying it was the right thing, which is all
that matters by now.

Thanks,
         Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ