[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140331150625.ca937ea946da5ce619efe2cf@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:06:25 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] checkpatch: Expand parenthesis alignment test to
declarations, functions and assignments
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:58:07 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> Currently the parenthesis alignment test works only on
> misalignments of if statements like
>
> if (foo(bar,
> baz)
>
> Expand the test to find misalignments like:
>
> static inline int foo(int bar,
> int baz)
>
> and
>
> foo(bar,
> baz);
>
> and
>
> foo = bar(baz,
> qux);
>
> Expand the $Inline keyword for __inline and __inline__ too.
> Add $Inline to $Declare so it also matches "static inline <foo>".
I'm having trouble understanding what this patch actually does. Some
little examples would be nice.
I typed in this to play with:
void foo(int a,
int b)
{
}
but I experienced playus interruptus
akpm3:/usr/src/25> perl scripts/checkpatch.pl -f t.c
Global symbol "$c90_Keywords" requires explicit package name at scripts/checkpatch.pl line 2162.
Execution of scripts/checkpatch.pl aborted due to compilation errors.
System is Ubuntu 12.04.4 (ish).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists