linux-kernel - Re: Feb. Fedora Kernel Patch Report

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:58:12 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>,
	"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Fedora <kernel@...ts.fedoraproject.org>
Subject: Re: Feb. Fedora Kernel Patch Report

On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 02:16:38PM -0700, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 26-03-14 15:51:35, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > On 03/26/2014 02:44 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 10:13:29AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > >>> cgroup-fixes.patch (rhbz 1045755)
> > >>> - Upstream commits 0ab02ca8f887908152d1a96db5130fc661d36a1e
> > >>> - There was a 3.12 version of this patch sent to stable list from
> > >>> Michal Hocko.  I don't remember why it wasn't applied, or why it
> > >>> wasn't applied for 3.13.y...
> > >>
> > >> It didn't apply to 3.13, and I think I was waiting for a backported
> > >> version, do you have one?
> > > 
> > > As far as I know we're using this version:
> > > 
> > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cgroups/10336/focus=1646465
> > > 
> > > The commentary on the thread seems to imply that Michal was going to
> > > send it again for some reason.  Michal, did you send the 3.12/3.13
> > > backport for this commit directly to stable?
> > 
> > In the meantime, I applied to the stable 3.12 Michal's version from suse
> > enterprise 12. I believe that it is the same as in the link above.
> > Please confirm.
> 
> Do not remember why it didn't end up in the stable back then but yes the
> fix you have queued up seems to be the right one.

Thanks, I've picked that one up now.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/