| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <lsq.1396221815.536646415@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 00:23:35 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Chris Ball" <chris@...ntf.net>,
"Aisheng Dong" <b29396@...escale.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 044/200] mmc: sdhci: fix lockdep error in tuning routine
3.2.56-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Aisheng Dong <b29396@...escale.com>
commit 2b35bd83467df6f8284b9148d6f768148c3a5e5f upstream.
The sdhci_execute_tuning routine gets lock separately by
disable_irq(host->irq);
spin_lock(&host->lock);
It will cause the following lockdep error message since the &host->lock
could also be got in irq context.
Use spin_lock_irqsave/spin_unlock_restore instead to get rid of
this error message.
[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
3.13.0-rc1+ #287 Not tainted
---------------------------------
inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
kworker/u2:1/33 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
(&(&host->lock)->rlock){?.-...}, at: [<8045f7f4>] sdhci_execute_tuning+0x4c/0x710
{IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:
[<8005f030>] mark_lock+0x140/0x6ac
[<80060760>] __lock_acquire+0xb30/0x1cbc
[<800620d0>] lock_acquire+0x70/0x84
[<8061d1c8>] _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x40
[<804605cc>] sdhci_irq+0x24/0xa68
[<8006b1d4>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x54/0x18c
[<8006b350>] handle_irq_event+0x44/0x64
[<8006e50c>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xa0/0x170
[<8006a8f0>] generic_handle_irq+0x30/0x44
[<8000f238>] handle_IRQ+0x54/0xbc
[<8000864c>] gic_handle_irq+0x30/0x64
[<80013024>] __irq_svc+0x44/0x5c
[<80329bf4>] dev_vprintk_emit+0x50/0x58
[<80329c24>] dev_printk_emit+0x28/0x30
[<80329fec>] __dev_printk+0x4c/0x90
[<8032a180>] dev_err+0x3c/0x48
[<802dd4f0>] _regulator_get+0x158/0x1cc
[<802dd5b4>] regulator_get_optional+0x18/0x1c
[<80461df4>] sdhci_add_host+0x42c/0xbd8
[<80464820>] sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe+0x378/0x67c
[<8032ee88>] platform_drv_probe+0x20/0x50
[<8032d48c>] driver_probe_device+0x118/0x234
[<8032d690>] __driver_attach+0x9c/0xa0
[<8032b89c>] bus_for_each_dev+0x68/0x9c
[<8032cf44>] driver_attach+0x20/0x28
[<8032cbc8>] bus_add_driver+0x148/0x1f4
[<8032dce0>] driver_register+0x80/0x100
[<8032ee54>] __platform_driver_register+0x50/0x64
[<8084b094>] sdhci_esdhc_imx_driver_init+0x18/0x20
[<80008980>] do_one_initcall+0x108/0x16c
[<8081cca4>] kernel_init_freeable+0x10c/0x1d0
[<80611b28>] kernel_init+0x10/0x120
[<8000e9c8>] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c
irq event stamp: 805
hardirqs last enabled at (805): [<8061d43c>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x38/0x4c
hardirqs last disabled at (804): [<8061d2c8>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x24/0x54
softirqs last enabled at (570): [<8002b824>] __do_softirq+0x1c4/0x290
softirqs last disabled at (561): [<8002bcf4>] irq_exit+0xb4/0x10c
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock);
<Interrupt>
lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by kworker/u2:1/33:
#0: (kmmcd){.+.+..}, at: [<8003db18>] process_one_work+0x128/0x468
#1: ((&(&host->detect)->work)){+.+...}, at: [<8003db18>] process_one_work+0x128/0x468
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 33 Comm: kworker/u2:1 Not tainted 3.13.0-rc1+ #287
Workqueue: kmmcd mmc_rescan
Backtrace:
[<80012160>] (dump_backtrace+0x0/0x10c) from [<80012438>] (show_stack+0x18/0x1c)
r6:bfad0900 r5:00000000 r4:8088ecc8 r3:bfad0900
[<80012420>] (show_stack+0x0/0x1c) from [<806169ec>] (dump_stack+0x84/0x9c)
[<80616968>] (dump_stack+0x0/0x9c) from [<806147b4>] (print_usage_bug+0x260/0x2d0)
r5:8076ba88 r4:80977410
[<80614554>] (print_usage_bug+0x0/0x2d0) from [<8005f0d0>] (mark_lock+0x1e0/0x6ac)
r9:8005e678 r8:00000000 r7:bfad0900 r6:00001015 r5:bfad0cd0
r4:00000002
[<8005eef0>] (mark_lock+0x0/0x6ac) from [<80060234>] (__lock_acquire+0x604/0x1cbc)
[<8005fc30>] (__lock_acquire+0x0/0x1cbc) from [<800620d0>] (lock_acquire+0x70/0x84)
[<80062060>] (lock_acquire+0x0/0x84) from [<8061d1c8>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x40)
r7:00000000 r6:bfb63000 r5:00000000 r4:bfb60568
[<8061d198>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x0/0x40) from [<8045f7f4>] (sdhci_execute_tuning+0x4c/0x710)
r4:bfb60000
[<8045f7a8>] (sdhci_execute_tuning+0x0/0x710) from [<80453454>] (mmc_sd_init_card+0x5f8/0x660)
[<80452e5c>] (mmc_sd_init_card+0x0/0x660) from [<80453748>] (mmc_attach_sd+0xb4/0x180)
r9:bf92d400 r8:8065f364 r7:00061a80 r6:bfb60000 r5:8065f358
r4:bfb60000
[<80453694>] (mmc_attach_sd+0x0/0x180) from [<8044d9f8>] (mmc_rescan+0x284/0x2f0)
r5:8065f358 r4:bfb602f8
[<8044d774>] (mmc_rescan+0x0/0x2f0) from [<8003db94>] (process_one_work+0x1a4/0x468)
r8:00000000 r7:bfb55eb0 r6:bf80dc00 r5:bfb602f8 r4:bfb35980
r3:8044d774
[<8003d9f0>] (process_one_work+0x0/0x468) from [<8003e850>] (worker_thread+0x118/0x3e0)
[<8003e738>] (worker_thread+0x0/0x3e0) from [<80044de0>] (kthread+0xd4/0xf0)
[<80044d0c>] (kthread+0x0/0xf0) from [<8000e9c8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)
r7:00000000 r6:00000000 r5:80044d0c r4:bfb37b40
Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <b29396@...escale.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2:
- Adjust context
- There's no platform_execute_tuning hook]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 20 +++++++-------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -1670,12 +1670,12 @@ static int sdhci_execute_tuning(struct m
int tuning_loop_counter = MAX_TUNING_LOOP;
unsigned long timeout;
int err = 0;
+ unsigned long flags;
host = mmc_priv(mmc);
sdhci_runtime_pm_get(host);
- disable_irq(host->irq);
- spin_lock(&host->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
ctrl = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
@@ -1689,8 +1689,7 @@ static int sdhci_execute_tuning(struct m
(host->flags & SDHCI_SDR50_NEEDS_TUNING)))
ctrl |= SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING;
else {
- spin_unlock(&host->lock);
- enable_irq(host->irq);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
sdhci_runtime_pm_put(host);
return 0;
}
@@ -1752,15 +1751,12 @@ static int sdhci_execute_tuning(struct m
host->cmd = NULL;
host->mrq = NULL;
- spin_unlock(&host->lock);
- enable_irq(host->irq);
-
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
/* Wait for Buffer Read Ready interrupt */
wait_event_interruptible_timeout(host->buf_ready_int,
(host->tuning_done == 1),
msecs_to_jiffies(50));
- disable_irq(host->irq);
- spin_lock(&host->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
if (!host->tuning_done) {
pr_info(DRIVER_NAME ": Timeout waiting for "
@@ -1833,8 +1829,7 @@ out:
err = 0;
sdhci_clear_set_irqs(host, SDHCI_INT_DATA_AVAIL, ier);
- spin_unlock(&host->lock);
- enable_irq(host->irq);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
sdhci_runtime_pm_put(host);
return err;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists