| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtCH0AhxM8TUeqjnnFVmpLd1D39B4gV2SaWmHX21iLNVuA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 11:05:16 +0200 From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org> To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, "rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>, "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>, Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHC 0/3] sched/idle : find the idlest cpu with cpuidle info On 1 April 2014 09:43, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote: > On 04/01/2014 09:16 AM, Vincent Guittot wrote: >> >> On 31 March 2014 17:55, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 03/31/2014 03:52 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 28 March 2014 13:29, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The following patchset provides an interaction between cpuidle and the >>>>> scheduler. >>>>> >>>>> The first patch encapsulate the needed information for the scheduler in >>>>> a >>>>> separate cpuidle structure. The second one stores the pointer to this >>>>> structure >>>>> when entering idle. The third one, use this information to take the >>>>> decision to >>>>> find the idlest cpu. >>>>> >>>>> After some basic testing with hackbench, it appears there is an >>>>> improvement for >>>>> the performances (small) and for the duration of the idle states (which >>>>> provides >>>>> a better power saving). >>>>> >>>>> The measurement has been done with the 'idlestat' tool previously >>>>> posted >>>>> in this >>>>> mailing list. >>>>> >>>>> So the benefit is good for both sides performance and power saving. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Daniel, >>>> >>>> I have looked at your results and i'm a bit surprised that you have so >>>> much time in C-state with a test that involved 400 tasks on a dual >>>> cores HT system. You shouldn't have any CPUs in idle state when >>>> running hackbench; the total time of core0state in C7-IVB is >>>> 87932131.00(us), which is quite huge for a bench that runs 44sec. Or >>>> i'm doing something wrong in the interpretation of the results ? >>> >>> >>> >>> No, actually I mixed the output of hackbench without being run with >>> idlestat >>> or with idlestat. >>> >>> The hackbench's results below are without idlestat. >>> >>> The idlestat results are consistent and effectively it adds a non >>> negligeable overhead as it impacts the hackbench results. >>> >>> So to summarize, hackbench has been run 4 times. >>> >>> 1, 2 : without idlestat, with and without the patchset - hackbench >>> results >>> ~42 secs >>> >>> 3, 4 : with idlestat, with and without the patchset - hackbench results >>> ~87 >>> secs >>> >>> At the first the glance, the results are consistent but I will double >>> check >>> them. >>> >>> Do you have a suggestion for a benchmarking program ? >> >> >> We are working on a bench which can generate middle load pattern with >> idle CPUs but it's not available yet. In the mean time, one bench that >> plays with idle time is cyclictest, it will not give you performance >> results but only scheduling latency which might be what you are >> looking for. > > > Yeah, thanks. I believe I know what is in the rt-tests package :) > > What I meant is what kind of values would you like to see with this patchset > ? IIUC, you patch tries to improve the wake up latency of a task by selecting the CPUs with the shallowest C-state, so this metrics seems to be a good candidate > > > > >>>>> The select_idle_sibling could be also improved in the same way. >>>>> >>>>> ====================== test with hackbench 3.14-rc8 >>>>> ========================= >>>>> >>>>> /usr/bin/hackbench -l 10000 -s 4096 >>>>> >>>>> Running in process mode with 10 groups using 40 file descriptors each >>>>> (== >>>>> 400 tasks) >>>>> Each sender will pass 10000 messages of 4096 bytes >>>>> >>>>> Time: 44.433 >>>>> >>>>> Total trace buffer: 1846688 kB >>>>> clusterA@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) max(us) >>>>> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C1-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C1E-VB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C3-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C7-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> core0@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) >>>>> max(us) >>>>> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C1-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C1E-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C3-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C7-IVB 1396 87932131.00 62988.63 0.00 >>>>> 320146.00 >>>>> cpu0@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) >>>>> max(us) >>>>> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C1-IVB 1 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 >>>>> C1E-VB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C3-IVB 1 262.00 262.00 262.00 >>>>> 262.00 >>>>> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C7-IVB 1180 87938177.00 74523.88 1.00 >>>>> 320147.00 >>>>> 1701 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1700 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1600 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1500 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1400 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1300 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1200 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1100 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1000 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 900 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 >>>>> 800 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 782 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> cpu0 wakeups name count >>>>> irq009 acpi 1 >>>>> cpu1@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) >>>>> max(us) >>>>> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C1-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C1E-VB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C3-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C7-IVB 475 87941356.00 185139.70 322.00 >>>>> 1500690.00 >>>>> 1701 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1700 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1600 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1500 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1400 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1300 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1200 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1100 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1000 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 900 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 800 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 782 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> cpu1 wakeups name count >>>>> irq009 acpi 3 >>>>> core1@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) >>>>> max(us) >>>>> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C1-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C1E-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C3-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C7-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> cpu2@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) >>>>> max(us) >>>>> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C1-IVB 11 288157.00 26196.09 16.00 >>>>> 200060.00 >>>>> C1E-VB 6 221601.00 36933.50 79.00 >>>>> 200066.00 >>>>> C3-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C7-IVB 950 87417466.00 92018.39 19.00 >>>>> 200074.00 >>>>> 1701 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1700 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1600 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1500 2 34.00 17.00 11.00 23.00 >>>>> 1400 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1300 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1200 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1100 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1000 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 900 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 800 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 782 745 18800.00 25.23 2.00 >>>>> 156.00 >>>>> cpu2 wakeups name count >>>>> irq019 ahci 50 >>>>> irq009 acpi 17 >>>>> cpu3@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) >>>>> max(us) >>>>> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C1-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C1E-VB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C3-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C7-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1701 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1700 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1600 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1500 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1400 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1300 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1200 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1100 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1000 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 900 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 800 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 782 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> cpu3 wakeups name count >>>>> >>>>> ================ test with hackbench 3.14-rc8 + patchset >>>>> ==================== >>>>> >>>>> /usr/bin/hackbench -l 10000 -s 4096 >>>>> >>>>> Running in process mode with 10 groups using 40 file descriptors each >>>>> (== >>>>> 400 tasks) >>>>> Each sender will pass 10000 messages of 4096 bytes >>>>> >>>>> Time: 42.179 >>>>> >>>>> Total trace buffer: 1846688 kB >>>>> clusterA@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) max(us) >>>>> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C1-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C1E-VB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C3-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C7-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> core0@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) >>>>> max(us) >>>>> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C1-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C1E-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C3-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C7-IVB 880 89157590.00 101315.44 0.00 >>>>> 400184.00 >>>>> cpu0@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) >>>>> max(us) >>>>> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C1-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C1E-VB 1 233.00 233.00 233.00 >>>>> 233.00 >>>>> C3-IVB 1 260.00 260.00 260.00 >>>>> 260.00 >>>>> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C7-IVB 700 89162006.00 127374.29 182.00 >>>>> 400187.00 >>>>> 1701 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1700 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1600 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1500 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1400 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1300 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1200 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1100 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1000 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 900 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 800 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 782 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> cpu0 wakeups name count >>>>> irq009 acpi 2 >>>>> cpu1@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) >>>>> max(us) >>>>> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C1-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C1E-VB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C3-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C7-IVB 334 89164805.00 266960.49 1.00 >>>>> 1500677.00 >>>>> 1701 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1700 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1600 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1500 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1400 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1300 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1200 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1100 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1000 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 900 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 800 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 782 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> cpu1 wakeups name count >>>>> irq009 acpi 6 >>>>> core1@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) >>>>> max(us) >>>>> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C1-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C1E-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C3-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C7-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> cpu2@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) >>>>> max(us) >>>>> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C1-IVB 19 2169047.00 114160.37 18.00 >>>>> 999129.00 >>>>> C1E-IB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C3-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C7-IVB 376 86993307.00 231365.18 20.00 >>>>> 1500682.00 >>>>> 1701 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1700 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1600 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1500 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1400 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1300 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1200 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1100 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1000 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 900 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 800 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 782 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> cpu2 wakeups name count >>>>> irq009 acpi 32 >>>>> irq019 ahci 45 >>>>> cpu3@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) >>>>> max(us) >>>>> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C1-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C1E-VB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C3-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> C7-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1701 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1700 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1600 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1500 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1400 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1300 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1200 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1100 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 1000 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 900 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 800 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> 782 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >>>>> cpu3 wakeups name count >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Daniel Lezcano (3): >>>>> cpuidle: encapsulate power info in a separate structure >>>>> idle: store the idle state the cpu is >>>>> sched/fair: use the idle state info to choose the idlest cpu >>>>> >>>>> arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h | 6 +- >>>>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c | 4 +- >>>>> drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 4 +- >>>>> drivers/base/power/domain.c | 6 +- >>>>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-at91.c | 4 +- >>>>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-big_little.c | 9 +-- >>>>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-calxeda.c | 6 +- >>>>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-kirkwood.c | 4 +- >>>>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c | 8 +-- >>>>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c | 12 ++-- >>>>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-ux500.c | 14 ++--- >>>>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-zynq.c | 4 +- >>>>> drivers/cpuidle/driver.c | 6 +- >>>>> drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c | 14 +++-- >>>>> drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c | 8 +-- >>>>> drivers/cpuidle/sysfs.c | 2 +- >>>>> drivers/idle/intel_idle.c | 112 >>>>> +++++++++++++++++----------------- >>>>> include/linux/cpuidle.h | 10 ++- >>>>> kernel/sched/fair.c | 46 ++++++++++++-- >>>>> kernel/sched/idle.c | 17 +++++- >>>>> kernel/sched/sched.h | 5 ++ >>>>> 21 files changed, 180 insertions(+), 121 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> 1.7.9.5 >>>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs >>> >>> Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | >>> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | >>> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog >>> > > > -- > <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs > > Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | > <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | > <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists