lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 1 Apr 2014 11:55:48 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <>
To:	Mike Galbraith <>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <>,
	Peter Zijlstra <>,
	LKML <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: update_rq_clock() must skip ONE update

* Mike Galbraith <> wrote:

> On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 11:37 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: 
> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Mike Galbraith
> > <> wrote:
> > >
> > > Oh, I didn't cc you because I wanted it applied instantly as ultra
> > > critical, only because the chain of events might be of interest.
> > 
> > Ok. That was my main worry, since I was in the process or releasing
> > 3.14, and I just couldn't tell if the patch was something I should
> > worry about or not.
> > 
> > And it seems that not applying it was the right thing, which is all
> > that matters by now.
> Yes.  Jocular red flag was to Peter and Ingo.  I don't try to bypass 
> them, that would be plain rude.  I've been known to help maintainers 
> a little, but I don't ever try to call the shots.  They do that 
> well.

Btw., in general feel free to Cc: Linus if a fix looks truly urgent, 
as neither Peter nor me might be around on a weekend, shortly before a 


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists