[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <533A2352.7000306@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 10:24:18 +0800
From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>, "Li Zefan" <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Zhangwei <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [BUGREPORT] Tasklet scheduled issue in Linux 3.4.x-rt
>> Because this patch does not exist in the latest Linus kernel, so I
>> have not reported this issue to kernel bugzilla.
>
> This patch exists in all -RT releases up to 3.12. If there is an issue
> with it, it should be solved.
>
> If the sched bit set is and you can't get lock later then the tasklet
> has be to active. Finally, not getting the lock in the tasklet code
> itself means it is still occupied by the "add-to-the-list" part which
> actually can't happen according to the code.
> You said, that you have an eight-way. Is this also NUMA? If so, does
> this problem happen if you disable NUMA (i.e. run only one NUMA node
> and use only the memory that is directly attached to the node).
Hi Sebastian,
The target platform is not NUMA, there is only one node.
Thanks!
Yijing.
>
>
--
Thanks!
Yijing
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists