[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <533A2E3F.7060705@hitachi.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 12:10:55 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
David Long <dave.long@...aro.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
Jonathan Lebon <jlebon@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] uprobes/x86: Kill the "ia32_compat" check in handle_riprel_insn(),
remove "mm" arg
(2014/04/01 4:44), Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Kill the "mm->context.ia32_compat" check in handle_riprel_insn(), if
> it is true insn_rip_relative() must return false. validate_insn_bits()
> passed "ia32_compat" as !x86_64 to insn_init(), and insn_rip_relative()
> checks insn->x86_64.
>
> Also, remove the no longer needed "struct mm_struct *mm" argument and
> the unnecessary "return" at the end.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
This looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Thank you,
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 10 +++-------
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> index d72dfbf..382a69d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> @@ -253,14 +253,11 @@ static int validate_insn_32bits(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
> * - The displacement is always 4 bytes.
> */
> static void
> -handle_riprel_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, struct insn *insn)
> +handle_riprel_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
> {
> u8 *cursor;
> u8 reg;
>
> - if (mm->context.ia32_compat)
> - return;
> -
> if (!insn_rip_relative(insn))
> return;
>
> @@ -314,7 +311,6 @@ handle_riprel_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, struct ins
> cursor++;
> memmove(cursor, cursor + insn->displacement.nbytes, insn->immediate.nbytes);
> }
> - return;
> }
>
> static int validate_insn_64bits(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
> @@ -343,7 +339,7 @@ static int validate_insn_bits(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm,
> return validate_insn_64bits(auprobe, insn);
> }
> #else /* 32-bit: */
> -static void handle_riprel_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, struct insn *insn)
> +static void handle_riprel_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
> {
> /* No RIP-relative addressing on 32-bit */
> }
> @@ -406,7 +402,7 @@ int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm,
> }
> /* fall through */
> default:
> - handle_riprel_insn(auprobe, mm, &insn);
> + handle_riprel_insn(auprobe, &insn);
> }
>
> if (fix_ip)
>
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists