[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140331232631.0021ba8c@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 23:26:31 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: update_rq_clock() must skip ONE update
On Tue, 01 Apr 2014 05:10:14 +0200
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com> wrote:
> Maybe it should just die as more potential trouble than it's worth. It
> has saved a pile of fastpath cycles, losing those again would be a
> shame. Accounting doesn't need to be perfect (is the enemy of good),
> but it does need to be a guaranteed good.
I don't think we should get rid of it. But better comments in the
scheduler would be nice.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists